• John Richard
    link
    81 month ago

    I like some of LXQt tools, but at one point do you decide if you’re going to use Qt… why not just go all out and use KDE?

    • Eugenia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      Because it uses 250 MB of RAM on a well-optimized distro (e.g. installing it on DietPi), instead of 1.5 GB of RAM.

      • John Richard
        link
        11 month ago

        So does many of the GTK tools though… so, again… why use Qt at all if you want to save memory.

        • Eugenia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          We’re talking about a whole desktop environment, not “gtk tools”. Both lxde and lxqt are lightweight, and have more utilities and prefs than the standard window managers, or the old stuff, like icewm.

      • John Richard
        link
        129 days ago

        I use Hyrpland, and so there are times where I need to use GTK or Qt tools. I generally don’t like KDE-based tools though because they are dependency-heavy.

  • @KISSmyOSFeddit
    link
    31 month ago

    Goddamn it, stop trying to lure me away from Debian again!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    So…

    2.0 was a switch to QT6

    and

    2.1.0 brings us Wayland? Very exciting! Definitely will check it out (as a full session), as I always pick apps from either XFCE or LXQT for my tiling window manager set up. I’ve been using Thunar lately, though I’m open to switching back to pcmanfm if I want to.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -21 month ago

    LXQt is the best desktop environment plus it’s so lightweight. LXQt is proof GNome is a bloated hot garbage.

    • Mark
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      So many more features than gnome, while being one of if not the most lightweight DE