• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s already a switch ongoing to cobalt-free batteries (half of Teslas produced in 2022 did not use cobalt batteries).

    • @dudebro
      link
      English
      151 year ago

      I don’t really think that’s the answer. We should be compensating these people accordingly for what they provide for us.

      There’s no reason they shouldn’t have thriving economies other than greed.

      No, we shouldn’t have to pay higher prices. The people at the top should be making less profit.

      Unfortunately, in places like Africa, there are just fewer people with an egregious amount of wealth. Even if we paid higher prices or the people at the top made less money, most of what is being made is being siphoned off by those exploiting the workers.

        • @dudebro
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          Yeah, the working conditions need to be improved so that this isn’t even happening.

          To be fair, they’re not all children like you’re clearly implying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        sure, but that goes for any product imported from/outsourced to a country with less worker rights.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    There was never any moral choice. The modern world can’t exist without exploitation. Return to the trees from which we came.

    • @dudebro
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I disagree. I think we can have the comforts of modern society without exploiting those who provide us raw materials for them.

      They should get to enjoy in the fruits of their labor as well. Unfortunately, most of their efforts are being siphoned away by greedy and corrupt people and their supporters.

      We can have enough so we all live comfortably.

      We just need to stop taking advantage of others to look good in front of our peers.

  • FarraigePlaisteach
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    He does the best job of explaining this that I’ve come across.

    I don’t want to support child slavery so I’m trying to quit batteries. instead of upgrading my laptop I got a desktop instead. I don’t plan on upgrading my mobile phone for the same reason and eventually I’ll either just have a pager or nothing.

    The electric car is a dilemma. I don’t know which industry is worse; fossil fuel or big tech.

      • FarraigePlaisteach
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        They might be cobalt free, but how long until we find out that they’re just as oppressive 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Switch to a more efficient fossil fuel car, or maintain your current car for as long as possible. Its more environmentally friendly to maintain something than build an entire new one

      • @xCookes
        link
        51 year ago

        Depending on how many miles you drive, this isn’t true unfortunately, a new electric car on a “relatively” clean electric grid can pay off its manufacturing emissions in as little as 12 months.

        “Using this model, Reuters found that, in the United States, a new 54-kilowatt-hour Tesla Model 3 must be driven 13,500 miles before it becomes cleaner than a Toyota Corolla achieving an average 33 mpg over its lifetime. However, if the same Tesla were driven in Norway, it emissions “break-even point” would come at just 8,400 miles, according to the analysis.”

  • @dudebro
    link
    English
    -71 year ago

    But the actors in hollywood need more money :\