The Dutch government said Friday that it may be forced to stop using Facebook after a warning from the Netherlands’ privacy regulator about the Meta owned social media platform’s privacy risks.

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (DPA) issued a statement advising the Dutch Interior Ministry not to rely on Facebook pages to communicate with citizens if it doesn’t have a clear idea of how Facebook uses the personal data of people who visit government pages.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    587 months ago

    Good. Also you shouldn’t need a relationship with a corporation (account) to get information from government agencies…

    • @SirQuackTheDuck
      link
      English
      137 months ago

      You don’t. They’re usually posting awareness campaigns that link to government sites.

      I’ve opted the example to elsewhere, but they’d be like “bought a house? Find out how the taxes work on (link)”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        It depends on the government I suppose. US National Weather Service offices posts bunch of weather info exclusively to Twitter (and sometimes Facebook).

        • @stellargmite
          link
          English
          47 months ago

          Yeh generally it’s about reach. In the case of NWS Technically its not exclusive as their data and messaging is distributed by other channels, including traditional, and their own site(s). But for ticking the social media box they’re likely to select the platforms with the most reach. Dissappointing that its only the one if that is the case, but the US is the land of officiated orthodoxy I’ve found. There are advantages sometimes - less triplication of labour in the case of humans needing to curate social media output for example. Bring on interoperability of platforms, please.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            Technically its not exclusive as their data and messaging is distributed by other channels, including traditional, and their own site(s)

            Not in my experience. I know because I’ve corresponded with my office, and complained about posts that aren’t tied to a particular weather product (like the Weather Story) or disseminated otherwise.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Can you read posts on Facebook without an account? Last time I tried it wasn’t possible.

        • @SirQuackTheDuck
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The posts aren’t constraining the information though. They’re effectively advertisements linking to the information (advertising they have info for you to read).

          The information itself is public and freely accessible.

          • @douglasg14b
            link
            English
            37 months ago

            In many cases no it is not…

            The sheriff’s department in my town for example has no information on the public website for the municipality. All of their information is shared on Facebook and only Facebook.

            The same thing goes with many other departments and public services.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    307 months ago

    Good. Start your own Mastodon instance exclusively for government accounts, and let users subscribe to those accounts from other instances.

    Bonus is that you get RSS feeds for every account on Mastodon.

  • @AshMan85
    link
    English
    267 months ago

    so should everyone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 months ago

    Philippines should be next. Unfortunately the lack of net neutrality allows our telcos to literally provide unlimited text-only Facebook access for free, like wtf…

    • Ahri Boy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      Free at the cost of user data being trashed out. DOST servers could host a Mastodon instance.

  • @cosmicrookie
    link
    English
    97 months ago

    I left it back in November when they forced me to either pay or accept. That said, we need a replacement for facebook, that is made for the EU and by the EU. Sure fediverse is great, but it still is a niche social media for us nerds.

    We need the Facebook styled feed that 60+ year olds feel comfortable scrolling through, instead of the Reddit wannabe format

    • just another dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 months ago

      I have no need for this in my life, so I’m not sure about the specifics. But isn’t diaspora fediverse and supposed to be more like Facebook, rather than microblogging or lemmy?

  • @douglasg14b
    link
    English
    97 months ago

    Thank god, governments (local and larger) should not be using Facebook as a sole/primary means of communication.

    It’s infinitely frustrating that my own municipality makes announcements and shares public information on a platform that is not always accessible to the residents that constitute that municipality.

    Information should be shared on the official municipality website in the same manner, and copied over to Facebook for ease of access to those who use it.

  • @Linkerbaan
    link
    English
    57 months ago

    Great news. Treat all social media equally.