• decadentrebelOPM
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Filipinos are giving way too much malice to a completely innocuous response and finding an excuse for outrage again. Ang ayos ayos ng sagot ng BGC kinukulayan ng ibang meaning.

    BGC is simply promoting Banksy’s exhibit which will be held on MET, a museum that existed long before that business district was established. Whether Banksy represents anti-capitalism or street art is irrelevant. That doesn’t mean you can just waltz in on private property and start painting away.

    Now, it remains to be seen if Banksy sanctioned the use of his works by MET. If that’s the case, you should aim your hate towards the museum (either for using his works without permission or for “gentrifying” his art) not BGC.

    PS: And idk about you but Banksy is no longer the pure political activist he once was. He viciously defends his IP nowadays and his designs are even used with Bearbricks (collectibles ng mga millionaire rich kids) or a part of art auctions kahit prank pa yan. There’s nothing necessarily wrong with that because in the end we live in a consumerist, capitalistic society and concessions must be made, which is why I don’t agree with losing your shit over a museum curating your artwork. In the end, people get to see and appreciate your work and perhaps sympathize with your cause, which I believe was the point?

    • decadentrebelOPM
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There are plenty of unauthorized Banksy exhibits (the most popular one being Mystery of Banksy). I’m not sure why he (or anyone) should be bothered by it when the bottomline is for people — whether mayaman or middle class (regardless of the irony) or mahihirap — to appreciate his art. If it’s a concern about the organizers profiting then yeah, that is a valid concern, but based on the internet rants, it’s more about the “irony” than money.

      Gatekeeping his work is just as bad as the gatekeeping they accuse BGC of, lmao.