Talking about those collage images we see after a users post.

  • Em Adespoton
    link
    fedilink
    641 year ago

    I always found them annoying in the first place.

    Back in the day when forums were mostly listservs, they made sense as the sig was where you stuck your finger info, so others could look you up.

    But once things switched to real forums with user profiles, the original purpose was redundant as that information could be found linked to the username. So people started cluttering them with little digital billboards instead.

    At that point, it served no real purpose and wasted data and (with the advent of mobile browsing) screen real estate.

    • @WhatASave
      link
      271 year ago

      But what if I want to brag about my computer components or car mods that I’ve done?? Where do I put that so people can see it on every post?!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        I’ve got something even better: An edgy yearbook quote from high school! Everybody MUST see it!

      • @AttackBunny
        link
        71 year ago

        You mean the JDM tow hook, and limo window tint? Yeah. Totally need to brag about that shit. lol. I totally don’t miss that shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I debated adding a picture of my dog, but that felt like a bit much. Also, I never spent time on forums that allowed images in .sigs . They looked nightmarish.

        See the community I started at [email protected] !
        Lemmy member since 2023.
        ₍ᐢ•ᴥ•ᐢ₎

  • Action [email protected]
    link
    321 year ago

    Cause they were annoying as shit, and only a small class of users even liked them in the first place.

    Back in the 90s, a lot of forums would also ban your ass if you had an obnoxious signature to boot.

  • dismalnow
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    Because they’re redundant.


    Because they’re redundant

  • CarlsIII
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    Because people got tired of scrolling past the same giant dog image at the end of every other post

  • Curious Canid
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    There were some valid reasons to have them, if you go far enough back in history, but those reasons haven’t applied for a long time. Meanwhile, signatures gradually evolved into a plague. They often took up more space than the posts and they were often brightly colored or animated. Sigs made reading the actual text harder while serving as a distraction.

    As you might guess, I am glad to see them gone. What used to go into sig blocks can now go into your profile. Anyone who’s interested can just click. It’s a much better setup all around.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    I think it just made more sense to make a user’s username link back to a profile containing their bio rather than appending that bio to the bottom of every post. More economical in terms of space utilization and leads to higher signal-to-noise ratio in the thread.

  • @dhork
    link
    81 year ago

    People who were using forums 20+ years ago were using them on a computer or laptop, and had more screen real estate. They could make a small signature image line and still not take up much space relative to the rest of the page.

    I am looking at this on a phone right now, as you (probably) are. These screens are so much better than those, but also much smaller. Sigs would take up a significant portion of the page.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Because forums fell out of favour.

    Long answer: internet services became easier to use for non-technically savvy people. It’s no coincidence that as internet access broadened, sites like Facebook gained popularity because they gave people premade, customisable pages that could allow them to express themselves to others and engage in discussion.

    • Lysol
      link
      51 year ago

      It’s sad really, I still appreciate phpbb boards, but there’s really no reason to hang out on one if you don’t have any activity there anyway.

    • livus
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Early facebook was so different. It had all these weird customisable mini apps that embedded in your page. Like “hatching eggs” where someone would “give” you an egg and you had to wait to see what hatched out of it.

      • @kava
        link
        41 year ago

        MySpace was much cooler. Its where I started learning html/ CSS lol

        • livus
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For me it was Geocities. That was where my hideous early attempts at css got full reign, it was full of novelty cursors, etc.

          I tried to get my MySpace back recently but it’s tied to a hotmail account I no longer have access to.

  • AnonTwo
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    I think honestly you couldn’t make people happy

    If people hated sigs, you needed restrictions so they didn’t get out of hand

    Those restrictions were usually hated by people who liked sigs

    and overall it was a distracting feature from the main purpose.

  • @jocanib
    link
    61 year ago

    They were ever in favour?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess so people had them on their signature. There are even communities dedicated to creating one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    At some point the signatures were regularly larger than the actual posts and they became a laughing stock. Also they often contain information that only the signature’s owner cares about - if he even keeps it up to date.

  • Rhaedas
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    The better forums would only show the first post from a user having their signature, and any other posts by them on that thread it would be absent. That’s the biggest problem with such things, they end up cluttering the actual discussion.