The ethnographic account of an Inuit man manufacturing a knife from his own frozen feces to butcher and disarticulate a dog has permeated both the academic literature and popular culture. To evaluate the validity of this claim, we tested the basis of that account via experimental archaeology. Our experiments assessed the functionality of knives made from human feces in controlled conditions that provided optimal conditions for success. However, they were not functional. While much research has shown foragers to be technologically resourceful, innovative, and savvy, we suggest that this ethnographic account should no longer be used to support that narrative.
Pictures, sfw: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X19305371#ec0005
Paper breakdown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=InxxUbdIeGw
I did not expect to see this headline today.
Good to know. I’ll keep that knowledge close at hand.
Maybe wear neoprene.
OT: did you see this post I made? I would love to know your thoughts. https://mander.xyz/post/1122359
Too far back and not my region, but I’ve done age modelling and that looks all well and good as much as oxcal is my arch nemesis. I just updated my comment.
Much appreciated.
I cannot. I’m losing my marbles.
For science! swish
The ironic part is it’s really well done and well written.
This was the 2020 material science Ig Nobel winner. Personally I think their control for the annealing process is flawed but somewhat understandable given the difficulty in securing the amount of material necessary for a more refined experiment. For reference, here are all the papers citing this work: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=17315240754674471683
I beg to differ. It all comes down to intended use. Think of a poop knife kind of like a cookie straw in your hot cocoa.
If I kill a man with poop it’ll be a coprolite not a freshly laid deuce tyvm.
“Trench warfare”
