• Scott
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      Just checked myself and for me in the US, they want $35/mo after $2/mo for 3 months

    • @Telodzrum
      link
      51 year ago

      Bloomberg and similar publications are marketed to a particular subset and are all this expensive.

      • ofk12
        link
        21 year ago

        Yeah I was reading the financial times yesterday and they now want £55 per month for a subscription. Madness.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish that all the damn news sites would band together and make a Spotify for news. Or just let me pay a few cents for each article. I’m not gonna go subscribe to 50 news sites.

    • @echo64
      link
      191 year ago

      You probably don’t want a “Spotify for news” given what a hellscape subscription services have brought to every other platform.

      Maybe you should just go subscribe to one? Back in the day people just literally subscribed to a single journal that would come in the mail.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Spotify for News sounds like Google News. Clickbait and useless tiny articles.

    • @Rooty
      link
      51 year ago

      Go directly to Reuters and AP, most noteworthy news come from these two sources anyway.

  • Doll_Tow_Jet-ski
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    At the same time, it’s impossible to have independent journalism if we, the readers, don’t finance it. Not talking about Bloomberg in particular, but about independent journalism in general

  • @XeroxCool
    link
    81 year ago

    This isn’t a news article though. It’s an opinion. Content on a news site is not automatically a news article. That’s like thinking Fox monologues and calling it news because fake judge Janine or the gagged Cucker show is on Fox News