• @disguy_ovahea
      link
      346 months ago

      Evidence is not the obstacle in this case. They have plenty. Judge Cannon is the problem.

      • FenrirIII
        link
        26 months ago

        Judge Cannon and plenty of Trump supporters still in the FBI and DOJ.

  • @RapidcreekOP
    link
    226 months ago

    This case really looks like a slam dunk.

      • mynachmadarch
        link
        fedilink
        146 months ago

        I thought she’d been smacked down and told to stop lollygagging. Man, I didn’t think I could be more disappointed in our legal system but daily I’m proven wrong. Didn’t Jack Smith file at the start of April to have her removed from the case?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          146 months ago

          Not yet. He’s made reference to it in a couple filings, but hasn’t actually filed yet. My guess is that it’s such a monumental request for this particular trial, he needs there to be no question that he has her dead to rights, “When you strike at the king you must kill him”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          If there’s one person I don’t doubt it’s jack. If he hasn’t done it’s probably for a good reason.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The filings reviewed by CNN shed new light on the critical role that Walt Nauta, now Trump’s co-defendant in the classified documents case, played in giving the FBI justification to execute the search warrant on the former president’s Florida resort.

    Trump has been charged by special counsel Jack Smith with criminal mishandling of national security records and attempting to obstruct justice after the federal government subpoenaed their return.

    Nauta, who eventually stopped cooperating with the special counsel, is now claiming he was selectively and vindictively prosecuted because he refused to return to the grand jury for another round of testimony unless certain conditions were met, according to court pleadings he has made in the case that the judge is still considering.

    Nauta was referred to as “Witness 5” in the warrant but can be identified by comparing the affidavit to the transcript from his June 2022 grand jury appearance that was unsealed in recent days, as well as to other details that have come out in the criminal proceedings.

    According to the affidavit, the Justice Department sought from the Trump Organization Mar-a-Lago’s surveillance footage in the immediate days after Nauta’s grand jury testimony.

    In a separate set of filings made public in the Florida federal court case, Nauta also is asking US District Judge Aileen Cannon to throw out evidence that prosecutors obtained in searches of his phone and email accounts.


    The original article contains 1,081 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36 months ago

    After Nauta gave the grand jury testimony, the Trump aide replaced his initial attorney with one provided to him through Trump-world.

    Sank himself with that one.