• @SkyezOpen
      link
      778 months ago

      Valve support has historically been pretty awesome. They even replaced an index controller nearly a year out of warranty. Granted their controllers have a shit switch and they break after a few hundred hours, but good on support for being bros.

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          508 months ago

          That is why Gaben must be protected at all costs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          148 months ago

          That’s basically all corporate entities. They’re not beholden to the workers, the consumers, or the general public and instead answer to people generally trying to milk everything as hard as possible.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            38
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Not gonna defend corporations here, but valve isnt public. They are privately owned by the bosses and employees, valve has one of the lowest turnover rates in the industry. It is quite difficult to get a job there for that reason. So they are actually quite beholden to their workers.

            • lad
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 months ago

              At least until the leader gets corrupted by the power if there is enough of it. Then they become not so benevolent

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                28 months ago

                Hence the use of the word “can” and not “are”

                Valve wouldn’t exist at it is if it was public and might not exist as it is if it wasn’t for Newell (and I say that as a person that’s very critical of Valve, they’re still very far from how bad they could be considering their position)

                • lad
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  I see, that’s valid then, and I agree that Valve isn’t some godsend charity, it just happens to work better than the rest for us buyers

        • @Phegan
          link
          68 months ago

          Gaben has ensures that he has 51% of the company so he can veto anything including a leadership change. He would need to sell or die.

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      348 months ago

      The “Gaben wins by doing nothing” strategy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        148 months ago

        Have you seen him lately, semaglutide has done wonders for him.

        Which is good, as the gaming industry is officially dead once we lose Valve to corporate profit chasing as soon as he passes

    • NoLifeGaming
      link
      158 months ago

      The “don’t be a soulless public traded company” strategy

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        298 months ago

        It’s not shareholders specifically, but management that doesn’t give a shit about the company long term.
        The business has a fiduciary duty to benefit the shareholders, but it doesn’t have to be short term only, or at the cost of long term benefits.

        Most publicly traded companies end up with leadership who are only interested in justifying their employment through the next earnings call or making sure the stock price has gone up between when they last got options and when they next vest.

        Valve does good not because they don’t have shareholders, but because their leadership is not gonna get fired for thinking about next year instead of next quarter. So they don’t squeeze the consumers for every dime, so people stick with them, and developers stay even though their fee schedule is not the best because they have all the people.

        • @Donkter
          link
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          This is kind of true. But the leadership often answers to the board of directors, which have often been shareholders that buy into control of the company after it goes public. At this point, you have shareholders who own no personal stake in a company. Often their only goal is to make a profit, sometimes they’re “serial entrepreneurs” who make their millions getting on boards and “flipping” the company to make a huge profit in a short amount of time.

          So it’s kind of management, but it’s also management brought on by the presence of public investment in a company.

          Combine this with the fact that the law has come down more than once on the side of choosing options that make the company money over maintaining company policy and you get a really terrible culture of publicly traded companies gouging themselves for short term profit (or even long term profit done in a shitty way.)

          Oh, I realize I repeated some of what you said. But you did say “it’s not about shareholders” to be contrarian, then went on to explain (like I did) how it’s actually exactly because of shareholders.

          Edit: what the fuck I literally can’t comment on the comment below.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            I wasn’t actually trying to be contrarian, but okay.

            I’m pretty sure I didn’t explain how it’s actually shareholders, because the board of directors isn’t “the shareholders”, but leadership of the company.

            Valve isn’t publicly traded, but it’s still a corporation with shareholders, a board of directors, and the usual trappings of corporate leadership. They tend to operate in a not shitty way because their leadership isn’t interested in sacrificing greater long term profit for lesser short term profits.
            A private, family owned partnership style business can operate with a focus on short term profits over long term profits.

            The safest way to ensure that the leadership of both of those businesses out as much money in their pockets as possible is to continuously maximize short term profits. “The shareholders” aren’t the cause for that mindset.

        • P03 Locke
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Valve does good not because they don’t have shareholders, but because their leadership is not gonna get fired for thinking about next year instead of next quarter. So they don’t squeeze the consumers for every dime, so people stick with them, and developers stay even though their fee schedule is not the best because they have all the people.

          All of that short-term thinking is because of the stock market. All of their shareholders think of, day in and day out, is “line go up”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Well, I’ll disagree a bit there. The largest stock investors are institutional investors managing funds on behalf of retirement plans. Those investors tend to prefer consistent long term growth over a narrow quarterly growth target, and will actually look at things beyond just stock price, like strategy and long term market prospects.

            Short term thinking from the leadership team is them not having a good idea on how to provide the long term strategy that investors prefer, and instead hoping to appeal to the smaller group of investors who do only care about short term growth so they can secure their own payoff, potentially at the expense of the long term prospects of the company.

            Valve is a corporation. They have shareholders other than Gabe, many of whom are not employed at valve of in their leadership team. Their leadership team isn’t looking to ensure that their paycheck comes in over the future of the company, so they make good choices.
            Compare with companies like Coca-Cola, which are publicly traded but have that long term plan that lets them openly talk about sacrificing revenue to pursue product plans and market growth that leads to more stable long term profits.

            • P03 Locke
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              The largest stock investors are institutional investors managing funds on behalf of retirement plans. Those investors tend to prefer consistent long term growth over a narrow quarterly growth target, and will actually look at things beyond just stock price, like strategy and long term market prospects.

              Based on what evidence? They just make sure the line steadily goes up each quarter, instead of accounting for companies that invest potential profits into longer-term plans. If not, the 401K investor will either drop the stock, or put it in a higher-risk plan.

              That sort of thinking is akin to corporate suicide when in a publicly-traded market, so they don’t do it.

              A company like Valve isn’t publicly-traded, and they have a limited number of investors they can talk to about their plans. That and they have a reputation of quality products, so even the investors are going to put up with short-term drops in profitability for even more profits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      318 months ago

      Image

      I love this green text because valve really just be doing the bare minimum most of the time but everyone else is just so shit in comparison

      • Rose Thorne(She/Her)
        link
        fedilink
        128 months ago

        I feel like GOG deserves at least some respect. They don’t have a perfect track record, by any means, but I find them at least reliable, decent sales, have gotten some fun freebies out of them in the past.

        And, hey, shopping cart. Which shouldn’t be a selling point, I’m fucking flabbergasted that it came to this on any platform, but that’s another point above EPIC.

        • @thejoker954
          link
          58 months ago

          I agree although in some respects it feels like a dead app.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      288 months ago

      I can’t wait for the inevitable clusterfuck from Sony making PS+ sub mantatory to play their PC games online.

      • CALIGVLA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 months ago

        I don’t think they’re that dumb, I can see them making their own launcher with PS+ sub to get free games or something like gamepass, but locking online play behind a paywall on PC sounds too braindead even for them, it’d be an even worse PR suicide attempt than Epic’s exclusivity shenanigans.

  • Psaldorn
    link
    24
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Sony: we make so much money selling these games to a giant pc audience;

    Also Sony: what if we restricted them geographically a huge amount and require them to go through extra steps so we can (???) which allows us to (??? + Harvest data)?

  • @Son_of_dad
    link
    -318 months ago

    I’ll cry for you guys when all the Xbox and steam exclusives are on PlayStation

    • @Th3D3k0y
      link
      English
      258 months ago

      Steam exclusives

    • @pivot_root
      link
      4
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The chances of Valve games becoming PlayStation exclusives is pretty close to zero. The only way that would happen is if they were acquired by Sony, and hell isn’t freezing over any time soon.