So if I am understanding this correctly(let me know if I am wrong). It seems the people protesting against war were nonviolent and the people protesting for war were violent.
Sorry if this was too hard to follow, I know it is complicated. I would try to make it more simple, but I think if I did I would not have any words to use.
Spelling
Yes, this is about the people who attacked the students.
Well, the ones without badges.
Yeah i was able to get to the same answer that the “CNN Investigation” found by watching livestreams of the UCLA campus at the time for a couple minutes.
A bunch of people (partially with masks and or israel flags) showed up and started dismanteling the camp, beating the shit out of anybody trying to stop them.
for anyone interested, here a youtube livestream timestamp from up close at the beginning of the violence https://youtu.be/ZVEHoNAR9lo?t=6040
This went on for hours btw, with the police (campus and local) standing by doing nothing to stop people from being assaulted.
cops are outsiders
And they have a loooong history of infiltrating protests and starting shit to give cops a “reason” to attack the protesters and stop the protest.
that’s only when they’re not calling in the National Guard on the anniversary of the Kent State Massacre …
Alternative headline:
“People protesting against violence found to be nonviolent”
cops.
The outsiders who were most violent were the cops.
