She claims that the decision that allowed a Colorado web designer not to be forced to create a site contrary to her beliefs extends to her view that only heterosexual couples should be married.

  • Col3814444OP
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Won’t do your job because you are a Christian fascist? That’s a sacking.

    • @Seasoned_Greetings
      link
      91 year ago

      It’s Texas, so there’s unfortunately a decent chance that no one will hold that judge accountable.

      • sharpiemarker
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        No it’s all planned. Take it to the supreme court and, well, you know how it’ll go from there.

    • Bleeping Lobster
      link
      41 year ago

      Let’s hope so. This is exactly what many feared was coming.

      • 13zero
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        The Colorado decision was explicitly for creative works. Signing off on a certificate wouldn’t count, even under the insane far-right decision of SCOTUS.

        I’m afraid because of Dobbs.

  • Arotrios
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Not this shit again… already went through this drama with Kim Davis. She should be removed from the bench and disbarred to boot.

    • SCmSTR
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Wasn’t she that like, government-employed accountant or something that refused to marry gay couples? These people are so traditional, they have a learning disability.

  • Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    This person is a judge, so should be capable of understanding legal rulings. The ruling in question only applied to creative professions. Not judges.