• Zehzin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    10 months ago

    The last two generations of consoles were just PCs but worse. Now nearly all games are coming to PC anyway, what’s even the point? Just to pay them $70/year for the privilege of playing multiplayer?

    • Thassodar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m assuming they’re requiring a PSN account for PC ports so they can eventually put a subscription on having a PSN account.

      • Zehzin
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if they want to push their own launcher to bypass Steam’s 30% cut

        • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          But sony are different, they won’t end up returning to steam like the others have!

          Perhaps they are bolstered by that fact epic have done ok. But do they have enough free games to pull off the same plan?

      • SomeGuy69
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Their wet dream to bring online service costs to PC

    • h0rnman
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Now to be fair, the Switch was a fancy cellphone, but worse

      • Zehzin
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The Tegra in it was fairly old at that point IIRC.

        • aluminium
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          2015 Tablet specs with 2012 CPU cores at the helm. Yay.