• Funderpants
    link
    fedilink
    127
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Juror #2 an “investment banker” who gets all their news exclusively from Trump Truth social and Elon twitter. The red hat is there to save the day, hang the jury on some nonsense to protect the cult leader.

    If I’m wrong, and the jury convicts, point to this thread and I’ll donate $25 to charity.

    The observers in the court won’t say who it is, but I guarantee its that one.

    Edit: I have chosen Special Olympics Canada as the charity.

    Edit2: I was wrong, I will make that donation tonight and post the blurry receipt

    • HornyOnMain
      link
      fedilink
      61
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To balance it out and give to charity regardless of the outcome, I’ll donate $50 if you’re right. That way there’s always something good happening even if it may be small.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      317 months ago

      Nah. Most jurors are paying attention to the evidence. Trump supporters aren’t the lone rebels they think they are. There’s literally a mountain of evidence and the prosecutor’s closing argument was 6.5 hours long (not including breaks).

      Every other person in that jury room is going to want to go home and won’t put up with someone stopping them. Even if this dude tries anything (he probably won’t), he’s going to crack by day 3.

      I bet we see a guilty verdict for at least some of the charges within 3 days.

      • El Barto
        link
        87 months ago

        God I hope you’re right!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          57 months ago

          Some jurors just asked for and received a laptop from the prosecution with all the evidence on it. That means they won’t have to ask to view individual pieces of evidence, which will make this much faster.

          That tells me they are interested in the evidence and that they want to get this over with. A possible quick (3 day) decision would mean they are done by Friday.

          • @eran_morad
            link
            27 months ago

            All it takes is one traitor - one - and he walks.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              No, it doesn’t. You’re watching too much 24 hour news or something. These jurors don’t just silently vote, they discuss the case for the entire time.

              Any juror is going to be asked by the others how they came to their conclusion. There’s no way to get away with it without scrutiny. Trump supporters can’t stand scrutiny, especially not with this much evidence and 34 felonies! They should convict on at least some of them. Trump literally signed the checks.

              • @eran_morad
                link
                37 months ago

                You’re being naive. MAGA fucktards are not the sort of people who give a fuck about facts and revel in the thought of pissing off the decent among us.

    • @SarcasticMan
      link
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If you are right I will donate $25 worth of Monopolowa to my stomach.

      Edit: convicted lol I donated the Monopolowa anyway skål or should I say dzięki or would it be prost fuck it cheers!

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      The observers in the court won’t say who it is, but I guarantee its that one.

      Are the votes of the jury generally revealed?

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      I had saved this thread! Woo hoo! Glad you pulled through with your promise.

    • @Burn_The_Right
      link
      17 months ago

      I have chosen Special Olympics Canada as the charity.

      Well done!

    • @Dkarma
      link
      -77 months ago

      This is why there are alternates, tho. If the judge says the evidence is there to convict then the jury doesn’t have a choice. If one juror is a holdout they just get replaced by an alternate.

      • @Burn_The_Right
        link
        167 months ago

        Um. This is entirely inaccurate. I think you may have been misled.

        The judge is the arbitor of law (only) during the guilt/innocence phase. The jury is the arbitor of fact (only). Only the jury can determine what the facts of the case are, not the judge. In this way, only the jury can determine if sufficient factual evidence exists to fulfill the elements of a crime.

        Alternates take the place of jurors who leave (usually for health or family emergency), but jurors cannot be asked to leave because of their decisions in deliberation.

        • Funderpants
          link
          fedilink
          57 months ago

          Adding one other thing, a juror can be asked to leave for misconduct as well.

  • @RapidcreekOP
    link
    657 months ago

    “A truly hung jury would laugh Trump out of the locker room.”

    ~ Stormy probably

  • @StinkyOnions
    link
    307 months ago

    Hung is something Trump wished he was.

    • @kitnaht
      link
      15
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I certainly wish he was too. Just not in such a nice way :D

      • @ShunkW
        link
        117 months ago

        Quirk of English, but the word you’re looking for is hanged.

      • El Barto
        link
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Be careful with what you post publicly, friend.

        I hate Trump, but the SS takes comments like yours seriously enough to trigger an investigation.

        Edit: I’ve been schooled. So it’s more like winning the lottery. But is that a lottery you’d like to risk winning, though?

        • @kitnaht
          link
          5
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You’re talking out of your ass. Stuff like this is mild compared to what it takes to trigger that kind of response. Millions of people make comments like these on the daily.

          • El Barto
            link
            17 months ago

            Millions, huh? Show me 100,763 examples.

              • El Barto
                link
                37 months ago

                That’s not the 100,763 I requested. Checkmate!

                But more seriously, thank you for schooling me. I was indeed talking out of my ass, then.

                • @kitnaht
                  link
                  37 months ago

                  Sorry for being so harsh with my wording; I live in the south, so I’ve gotta deal with a lot of MAGA assholes and it’s kind of ingrained itself into my personality a little. Also, thanks for looking out for me, I know you were just trying to make sure I wasn’t targeted :)

    • @DandomRude
      link
      English
      107 months ago

      Some time back he might would have been for treason.

    • NegativeNull
      link
      47 months ago

      You know what they say about men with tiny hands…

  • @Sorgan71
    link
    147 months ago

    I mean I dont see how their dick size affects it but ok