I don’t have yet any preferences. Cheap, easy to set up, secure. What do you use and can recommend?

  • @maxgyver
    link
    English
    234 months ago

    Reolink. Cheap, good enough quality, great HA integration, no internet connection needed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      +1 they are completely local, cheap and have a tight integration with home assistant, I have 5 of their cameras.

    • adONis
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      can these be configured to stream TO a remote frigate server?

      Example: I’d like to install one at my parent’s house, connect it to my parent’s wifi, but have it stream to frigate, that’s hosted on my server in another city?

      • @maxgyver
        link
        English
        34 months ago

        i had frigate running locally and could integrate them. That said i grabbed the stream from the local network. I guess you would need some sort of local pi to forward the streams. But that is well above my pay grade ^^ sorry

        • adONis
          link
          English
          34 months ago

          Yeah, I’ve already heard about such a solution, where I’d need a Pi that acts as the streaming client, which then should work with any camera.

          • @maxgyver
            link
            English
            34 months ago

            apparently it’s possible without a relay look here

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It might not be original quality, but this should be fairly straightforward with a tunnel or VPN connection to your parent’s house. You’d also lose quality in having a WiFi camera instead of wired.

    • Strit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      Reolink cameras are twice the price of the Tapo ones in my area…

      • Convict45
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        And probably four times the quality. If I could go back in time and choose Reolink for every camera I have, I would. In a heartbeat.

        • Strit
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          I’m pretty happy with the 2K footage on mine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        I’ve never used either, so I can’t speak to their actual quality, but cheaping out on cameras defeats the purpose of getting cameras if the footage is too grainy or blurry to be used for anything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          The wireless Reolinks are not great. Like, nothing against the camera itself, however, the WiFi antenna must be smaller than the one in my watch. The range is truly abysmal.

          Tapo ones are perfectly fine, good quality all around, but it’s important to specify that I have experience with external, solar powered Reolinks and indoor Tapo, so it’s a bit of a different category.

  • Strit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    I use TP Link’s TAPO C310 for outdoors and a C200 indoors. They are Wifi or PoE and have a custom component for Home Assistant that works pretty well.

    • @ohlaph
      link
      English
      24 months ago

      I just got two Tapo C120 and 2 C125. Pretty happy with them so far.

  • @glimse
    link
    English
    34 months ago

    Amcrest gets recommended a lot but I have no personal experience with them

    • Convict45
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’ve owned a bunch of Foscam cameras, a sub-brand owned by Amcrest.

      Amcrest and its Foscam sub-brand seem very interested in getting access to your cameras, have less capable and less convenient software, and the cameras themselves seem less well built than Reolink.

      I bought a half a dozen V1 Wyze cams, and at least two of them have failed. I won’t touch that brand again. I also would never have used Wyze at all except for the exploit that allowed custom firmware installation for real local access and control.

      • @glimse
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        I thought Reolink cameras were just rebranded Amcrest…or is it just the chips and lenses?

        I will be using them with Frigate so I’m not too worried about the janky software unless it affects how Frigate operates

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      I’ve got amcrest and I integrate them into HA via mqtt using blue iris.

      But amcrest cameras need something like pihole to help block all their taking to the home base

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      I have a few. Some try and call home (mostly the doorbell, every 10s). The others are easy to setup and run with frigate.

      • @glimse
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        I thought the doorbell camera worked great with frigate, is that not the case? I don’t have a need for cameras yet but that was on my shopping list…all cameras will be on a locked down vlan so it’s fine if it TRIES to phone home if it still works “offline”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          The doorbell does, except for no sub stream. And the only way for mine to be setup is their bs app.

          I should’ve looked better when buying, but alas. I have this one and I’m lazy.

          • @glimse
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            Are you running them with Frigate? I was thinking the lack of substream wouldn’t be a problem because the frigate server could downscale if needed (but I haven’t really looked into it yet)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              Yes, the issue I have with no sub stream (only on the doorbell) is that it uses more processing for detection on such a large resolution.

              • @glimse
                link
                English
                14 months ago

                Ahh gotcha, didn’t consider that! I’ll have to make sure my processor is up for the task. I think it will be…I’m doing 4 cameras + doorbell max and buying a NUC

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 months ago

                  Just make sure they have substreams and get a coral (or GPU) for detection. Then a pi could probably handle it.

                  I have enough processing to do it all on CPU (8 cams+doorbell) but it ramps up the power usage, so it was better to use the gpu I already had for transcoding, as detection.

                  Without you can still just record and overwrite. Not that it’s extremely useful without detection and notifications.

    • @Jimbabwe
      link
      English
      34 months ago

      I use Amcrest, mostly because the guy who makes frigate recommended them, and has affiliate links on his site. As a software developer myself, I have to say frigate (and HA) are two jewels of open source software and so I’m happy to support them however I can.

      That being said, the cameras work well and are easy to integrate with both frigate and HA. They all try to phone home at first, but stop if you tell them to (I’ve confirmed this by monitoring the traffic on my dns servers).

      I couldn’t find a privacy friendly wifi camera with a big enough battery to run continuously, so I ended up building my own with a solar panel, an inverter, and a 9ah lithium battery that sits on a fence post at the end of my driveway. It was a fun project, but I wish I could buy it.

      Another small gripe is that the PTZ cameras from Amcrest all seem to be crazy expensive or have mixed reviews, so I’ve just held off on those for now.

      • @glimse
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        Thanks for the feedback, I’ll keep them on my list. I wasn’t considering the PTZ cameras just the inexpensive turrets and plan on running them PoE so it looks like those issues won’t affect me!

      • Convict45
        link
        English
        13 months ago

        Think you replied to the wrong person. I don’t like or recommend Amcrest.

        • @TCB13
          link
          English
          13 months ago

          Besides your take anything else against them?

          • Convict45
            link
            English
            23 months ago

            Amcrest is all up in your business.

            • @TCB13
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yeah, but aren’t others as well? My ideia was to run them on an isolated VLAN without Internet access. What brand would you recommend instead.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 months ago

    Not cheap but easy to setup and very very capable are the Dahuas. Especially in HA they are really mighty. But sadly they are not cheap.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 months ago

    I use Amcrest PoE dome cameras with frigate. Quality and price are excellent. My only complaints would be the dome cameras get dirty fast and at night the IR light from inside reflects off of the dirt and makes them useless. Frigate also seems pretty bad at detecting things in night vision mode. And yes, I’ve already made the recommended adjustments in my frigate config.