• Scrubbles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    306 months ago

    My response: “Sounds like I’ll be seeing it 100 days later”.

  • UKFilmNerd
    link
    fedilink
    English
    126 months ago

    I read somewhere the other day that things aren’t going well and they’re thinking of rebooting old IPs like The Incredibles.

    Is going back to past hits a good idea?

    • @Nutteman
      link
      English
      156 months ago

      I think Pixar has been pretty miffed at their stuff going straight to streaming so this may be a concession disney made to try to appease them.

      • OsaErisXero
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Just means I won’t watch it for longer, it doesn’t convince me to pay 20 bucks a ticket.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86 months ago

    Look everyone. Another sequel…can we get something new?

    • @XeroxCool
      link
      English
      136 months ago

      18 of their 27 films are originals. 9 are sequels/spinoffs (Lightyear, Monsters University). They have a pretty good track record.

      • Hal-5700X
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        I was talking about Hollywood as a whole. But game on.

        • @XeroxCool
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I understand it’s an industry problem, but I think credit should be given to Pixar, at least for now. I do have to say, I was surprised some sequels to their IP wasn’t actually Pixar, like Planes. I still don’t think a single sequel is cause for complaint, though. I generally enjoy the criss-crossing sequels of the Marvel universe because it saves a lot of time without extra exposition at the start. DC is where I’d complain about the lack of new IP because they love rehashing Batman and Superman. But even still, those are Rollercoaster movies meant to be fun, not a deep exploratory plot more akin to spending a day hiking a mountain instead of a theme park. The biggest issue with new IP is convincing the audience why they need to get attached to the characters in the first 20 minutes. Plenty of new movies come out and they typically flop.

    • Dem Bosain
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      Fuck you, here’s Beetlejuice. Remember Beetlejuice?

      • @Kelly
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        I love beetlejuice and have introduced it to the next generation.

        Thankfully my son is usually uninterested in legacy sequels/revivals of IPs where he has seen the original so will be able watch it if it reviews well or skip it if not.

        Unfortunately when he hasn’t seen the older iterations he is often quite keen. We hadn’t watched the earlier Garfield films (why would we?) so he was interested and we watched the new one today. (it was aggressively mediocre)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 months ago

    Love the theatre but my home setup is so fricken good now. The only thing traditional theatres can beat me on is sound and that’s only because I don’t want to disturb my neighbors.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 months ago

    Movies producers finally realizing that having their movies go to streaming a week later is bad for their movies and the movie theaters they want to show their movies in?

    • 🔍🦘🛎
      link
      English
      26 months ago

      Also kind of sounds like they don’t have a lot on the slate and are looking to have something in theaters for an entire season

      • @roofuskit
        link
        English
        16 months ago

        Disney has pushed like 3-4 releases back out of 2024.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46 months ago

    Something tells me it’ll be streamable about 3 days after its first theater screening in Russia