One critic described Alito’s cavalier expression of his right-wing views as “deeply troubling” for the Supreme Court.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/CSrN6

  • BrikoXOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    356 months ago

    I think this clown missed the class where US Constitution mentions “separation between Church & State”.

    • a lil bee 🐝
      link
      226 months ago

      I really wish it did, but the constitution does not contain that phrase. It does contain “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” (the establishment clause) but “separation of church and state” comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      166 months ago

      No no, my Christian fan fiction says the Founders were really thinking about the Jesus when they were writing that part, so it cancels out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      116 months ago

      Except the US constitution does not include that language. The “a wall of separation between church and state” phrase most notably comes from an 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association. Not a legally binding document by any means.

      I imagine you’re thinking of the Establishment Clause of the Constitution which forbids the US government restricting the free exercise of religion.

      I believe, iirc, the Supreme Court over several decades has affirmed and reaffirmed the overall position that the US government must remain secular and not favor a particular religion. Which is effectively what you’re getting at.

      • BrikoXOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You are correct. Though the meaning behind the phrase remains true and biding precedent. If only precedents meant anything in today’s court system. They reinterpret the Constitution on a daily basis to suite the billionaire needs whose paying them that day.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    28
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Well that’s terrifying. I’m starting to think you can’t have a real democracy without strong recall abilities on politicians. The fact that these people are untouchable in office no matter what we find on them is insane.

    • @skysurfer
      link
      16 months ago

      Question is, how do you keep that from being abused?

      • @troglodytis
        link
        76 months ago

        Recall those that abuse it.

        But we are lazy. So we wouldn’t do that. So it would be abused.

  • @carl_dungeon
    link
    English
    246 months ago

    Project 2025 piece of shit is what he is.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    86 months ago

    Your face when you gave control of your society to a death panel of Dark Ages clerics who interpret doctrine into law.