• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    295 months ago

    The dickhead who subpoenaed her

    Loudermilk personally led a tour of the U.S. House buildings complex on Jan. 5, 2021 — the day before the attack on the Capitol — involving people who traveled to Washington, D.C., to support then-President Donald Trump’s effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

    And

    some of the individuals attended Trump’s stop-the-steal rally at the Ellipse the next day, including one who was captured on video noting that the Capitol was “surrounded” and that the rioters were “coming” for Pelosi and other Democratic members.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      135 months ago

      She’s not going to put up with any bullshit. I look forward to her testimony.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 months ago

        Yeah, she seems good, and the article backs her up. Her previous testimony was ’ here’s what’s happening, here’s what could happen’ and it was ignored. Then the chief did the condoleeza rice ’ no one could have predicted this’.

    • @jeffwOPM
      link
      165 months ago

      No, it was a false flag operation

      No wait, maybe it was a hoax that the Dems overstated?

      Or just tourists?

      Sorry, they keep changing their story, I can’t keep track

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -15 months ago

      I mean, I know this specific investigation is in bad faith, but it was pretty widely known something was going to go down in DC and the Capitol Police definitely dropped the ball on this one (among other law enforcement agencies).

      Democrats should really be the ones investigating this but for whatever reason they’d rather run cover for the organisation that almost got them killed through incompetence, negligence or worse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That’s what I was including as an option within ‘or worse’, but I haven’t seen any evidence of it (mostly because the democrats didn’t seem to be interested in investigating this when they had both chambers).