• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    On the one hand, what a waste of money. But I can’t help but imagine if I won, that would change my life…

    • Justagamer
      link
      81 year ago

      If you want to be depressed, look at what happened to most lottery winner’s lives. Or an average NFL player. Or anyone gets a huge cash windfall.

      The best situations are gradual increases in wealth

      • @garretble
        link
        111 year ago

        Maybe so, but I’d take my chances with hundreds of million dollars.

        • Ferris
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Wear a full body spandex suit when you collect, so nobody can identify you. And spend very gradually. And never speak of it.

    • @Klear
      link
      61 year ago

      The odds of winning the jackpot are basically the same whether you enter or not.

      • elucubra
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        If you don’t enter, you have certainty of not winning

        • @Klear
          link
          01 year ago

          …and if you do enter, you are still certain not to win for all reasonable definitions of “certain”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Hey that $3 buys me the ability to daydream about my life as a multimillionaire for a couple days, before I crash back to reality slightly less satisfied than before!

        • @atri
          link
          11 year ago

          I too have abused whipits

  • @MicroWaveOP
    link
    61 year ago

    The new jackpot for Wednesday’s drawing would be the third highest in U.S. history and will keep growing until someone wins. Ticket buyers have a chance at $1 billion paid out in yearly increments or a $516.8 million one-time lump sum before taxes.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Always take the lump sum. Pay off your debts then stick it into reliable investments and live off the income from it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        With a 500m lump sum, you could also take a 100k to just blow on whatever you want with basically 0 impact. You definitely need to limit though l.

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I’ve thought about it a lot. Blowing any money is going to be dangerous because you’re risking getting addicted to that ever increasing spending.

          I sit here and say that but probably would blow through a lot lol.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            You need to blow some, more a a psychological reward than anything. The problem is definitely not increasing your standard of living to unsustainable levels, it’s not mega yacht money, but you could have a nice boat.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              There was a short story or thought experiment or something about this man who won a silk robe. To properly enjoy it he wanted to have a fancy tea served in a fancy pot. Then he wanted a nice chair to be in. It kept growing and growing. I don’t remember the details but it is definitely a good illustration of lifestyle inflation.

      • @MicroWaveOP
        link
        21 year ago

        Random but your Netscape avatar is awesome.

  • wnose
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Why can’t they just split it up and make it 100 $10 million prizes?

    • @RGB3x3
      link
      21 year ago

      Because then you wouldn’t get the people who rarely play to throw money in.

      The bigger jackpots incentivize those who don’t play for the “pennies” at less than 500 million. They actually reduced the odds of winning a few years ago for this exact reason.

    • @son_named_bort
      link
      11 year ago

      If 100 people have the winning numbers then that’s what’ll happen.

    • XIIIesq
      link
      11 year ago

      The Euro millions has a €240M cap at which the jackpot is divided up in to the lower tier prizes if there is still no winner. The UK national lottery has a cap on roll overs at 5 where the top prize will roll down to the lower tiers if no winner remains.

    • @TenderfootGungi
      link
      11 year ago

      They actually changed it, making it harder to win, to create these giant jackpots. The huge number draws people in.

    • ji17br
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Funny you say that. There’s about 300 million possible numbers so at $2 per ticket you only need to win over $600 million for the lottery to be plus EV. Factor in 37% tax (which is what Google says is the average rate, but may be different depending on state) you “only” need a jackpot of about 950 million to profit.

    • XIIIesq
      link
      21 year ago

      I play it. I know that the odds make me more likely to die in the time it would take me to claim the prize than to actually win, but someone has to win it and the lotteries in Europe and the UK give a lot of money to good causes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Lottery paid for my college education so yeah I don’t mind throwing 2 bucks at it every once is a while.