First, second, third person? Past or present? (Future even?) Limited or omniscient?

Also, if it is different for reading as opposed to writing, tell me why! I’m curious.

  • @vltraviolet
    link
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Writing: third person, present, limited

    Reading: any!

    • a_mac_and_conOP
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I’m always glad that I’ll read any too, because I’m picky enough with other things that if I refused to read something because of something general in the POV I might not read anything. XD

      • @ThunderQuack
        link
        11 year ago

        Only one that pissed me off enough to not read was not quotes around dialogue. Made me mad enough I sat there with a pen and wrote them in for the whole book haha

        • a_mac_and_conOP
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I know in other languages there are different ways to attribute dialogue, but when you are writing in English how is that supposed to translate? People who aren’t fluent in those languages can’t parse through it all. It’s not helpful. I personally don’t have time to figure that out when I could just read something else I don’t need to run through a punctuation filter.

          • @ThunderQuack
            link
            11 year ago

            I don’t even know. Couldn’t tell you the name of the book either this was years ago. They didn’t italicize or anything you were just supposed to contextually pick up that this here is spoken aloud.

  • LemmyLefty
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Standard: third person, either limited or omniscient. Nothing wrong with it, and it’s the easiest to read. It really shines when the author can use it to provide insight when necessary and pull back when they want to conceal information from the reader.

    Requires skill: first person. It’s not an automatic no on my part, but if I’m going to be locked into a character’s head then there needs to be enough characterization for it to be worth it. Only if I feel confident about my character do I write this.

    This is torture: second person and ANYTHING involving the reader. I will never, ever understand reader fics, and the concept makes me uncomfortable: is this why a lot of “the discourse” indicates younger readers often can only interact with fics from a self-insert perspective?

    Oh, and regarding tenses: mostly past, but what can be fun is deliberately violating tense. This only works if the author has established that they’re meticulous, so that, say, a sudden switch to present tense during an energetic or tense paragraph can make the text feel punchier.

    • a_mac_and_conOP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Reader-inserts are definitely not for me either. I’m not interested in kissing these canon characters which is… mainly what OC stories are about, unfortunately. I want to see what canon characters do in their world and how they react to each other. Sometimes I’m okay seeing how they react with OCs, but for the most part? It’s not why I read fic.

      I did write a second person fic recently, where the perspective was from a canon character. I enjoyed writing it, but I was under no impression it would be for many people (even if it wasn’t in a relatively inactive fandom). Using “you” for a canon character has echoes of writing in first person, but is very, very different. An interesting challenge.

      I’ve heard similar said about younger readers and self-inserts, but I can’t wrap my head around it. Even when I was young, I never read those stories. I did read a lot more OC centric stories back then, but I don’t know if it was because I really liked those or I was a bit stupid and didn’t understand how to search for anything else, so I just clicked on what came up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    [another attempt 2]

    preference for 3rd person, slight preference for past tense. i prefer a bit of a larger separation between our world and the world the fic takes place in.