• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1426 months ago

    The investigations uncovered Epstein’s close ties to former President Bill Clinton and Britain’s Prince Andrew, as well as his once friendly relationship with former President Donald Trump

    Dear AP, why the fuck are you downplaying Trump’s ties to Epstein? Trump hung out with child diddlers to diddle children. He was hilariously cagey when asked if he’d release Epstein materials as president.

    There may not be enough evidence to get him in court, but he should be held in the same group as Clinton and Andrew.

    • Gloomy
      link
      fedilink
      40
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      There is this, where a anonymous person has reported beeing raped by Trump as a Teen girl (please read this at your own discretion). She never went to court because she was intimidated.

      • @rayyy
        link
        286 months ago

        She never went to court because she was intimidated.

        Threatened. Death threats. Very thinly veiled death threats.

        • @Fedizen
          link
          46 months ago

          Didn’t stormy daniels say she feared she would be killed as well?

    • @morphballganon
      link
      7
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      What’d Clinton do?

      The only thing I read about Clinton and Epstein said that Clinton turned down a girl offered to him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        276 months ago

        What did Clinton do? You mean aside from keeping his mouth shut about being offered an underage girl?

        • @morphballganon
          link
          -176 months ago

          Can you clarify exactly which law Clinton broke?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Bro the guy was literally “the leader of the free world” and said nothing about his friend selling children to child diddlers and you are going to come at me with a “but akchually WHICH LAW DID HE BREAK?!?!?!?”. Go piss.

            • @morphballganon
              link
              06 months ago

              I was responding to a person who said Trump belongs in the same category as Clinton. So you believe Trump’s transgressions are no worse than keeping his mouth shut about illegal activity? It seems you are defending them by ridiculing me.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                You didn’t though. You replied to me saying this:

                What did Clinton do? You mean aside from keeping his mouth shut about being offered an underage girl?

          • @ThekingoflordaMA
            link
            156 months ago

            The law of “Jezus, every sane human knows to report that”

            • @morphballganon
              link
              26 months ago

              Perhaps there was already an investigation going.

              • @Fedizen
                link
                16 months ago

                more likely the prosecutors were on epstein island

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            96 months ago

            Laws should follow and codify ethics, not dictate them. If a transgression (such as not reporting CSA to the relevant authorities) is not already banned by law, that doesn’t mean it’s fine. It means the law needs to be amended.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              56 months ago

              In this specific case I agree, not reporting CSA should be illegal (and probably is?) I’m not so sure that we should codify the current ethical understanding into law though.

              We need to leave room for development. Forcing new ideas to first go through the battle of legalization isn’t helpful in this regard. Laws are there to regulate what normal social regulation can’t do properly.

              I think people who cheat on their partners are morally speaking bad people. But writing into law you can’t have multiple partners at once is quite obviously a bad decision, because there are happy polyamourus relationships. The government doesn’t need to get involved here, being treated like the ass that you are for cheating is punishment enough, and leaves the room for developing new ways of living together.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                46 months ago

                I guess we need to distinguish between legislation, regulation and case law established through judicial precedent. Legislation is definitely too cumbersome to react to shifting moral standards. Regulation and judicial precedent are more flexible in cases where legal consequences are warranted.

                As so often, there is nuance to the topic. General statements are hard to make both concisely and precisely. I opted for brevity, but you are absolutely right.

                Either way, we agree that complacency about CSA is fucked up.

            • @morphballganon
              link
              16 months ago

              Sounds like a precursor to a lot of dystopian novels/movies. Equilibrium?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            Motherfucker, diddling children could be legal tomorrow and i would still not fuck a child. The law doesn’t decide what’s right or wrong.

            • @morphballganon
              link
              16 months ago

              I agree, but is there any evidence Clinton did it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        If you hang out at a bar with Nazis in it, it’s a Nazi bar and you’re a Nazi too. Same with pedophile island. Some things are so evil if you know about it and do nothing you are just as complicit as the people directly doing it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    626 months ago

    Ah, yes. A little rape here, a little treason there….

    What’s not to love about America?

    Besides, if it’s an official act, you’re immune to prosecution!

  • @gedaliyahM
    link
    126 months ago

    Honestly I thought this was already pretty well known

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 months ago

    Florida was probably trying to make it legal during that