The UK government’s adviser on political violence said the growth of a “toxic, dangerous environment” in public life increased the risk of there being an assassination attempt on a British politician, as he called on the home secretary to launch an investigation into the intimidation of candidates in the election.
John Woodcock wrote to Yvette Cooper on Friday expressing his concern that a series of incidents in the election campaign could have been a “concerted campaign by extremists” that “underlined the gravity of the threat to our democracy”.
In an interview with the Guardian on Sunday, Woodcock, who has the title Lord Walney, said the apparent attempted murder of Donald Trump was “a vivid reminder of the vulnerability of all politicians”.
He added: “We have seen the growth in the UK of US-style politics of aggressive confrontation and intimidation which is unfortunately, exactly the toxic environment that could lead to another assassination attempt on a UK politician, of which we have already tragically seen a number in recent years.”
Many political candidates and their staff suffered threats and intimidation in the run-up to the election. Several of those targeted were female Labour candidates standing in seats where there was a strong opposition to the party’s stance on the war in Gaza.
Woodcock said he believed intimidation was increasingly being used as “a core electoral strategy to try to either get candidates defeated or bully candidates into submission”. He added that there was a particular pattern of abuse “created by aggressive pro-Palestine activists”.
…
Woodcock, who was a Labour MP before becoming a cross-bench peer, was appointed by Boris Johnson’s government as an independent adviser on political violence and disruption. The findings of his review on the issue were published 24 hours before the election was called.
Titled Protecting Our Democracy from Coercion, his report was condemned by protest groups, including Greenpeace and Just Stop Oil. They said its proposals, which included a review of undercover surveillance of activists and making protest organisers pay towards policing, would “weaken democracy”.
See also: Election abuse of candidates may have been coordinated
Interesting that the last murder of a politician was by the far-right but he clearly has groups on the left in his targets.
but he clearly has groups on the left in his targets.
Where in his statement do you see that. It seems to me his wording was non-biased.
Several of those targeted were female Labour candidates standing in seats where there was a strong opposition to the party’s stance on the war in Gaza
He added that there was a particular pattern of abuse “created by aggressive pro-Palestine activists”
This:
He added that there was a particular pattern of abuse “created by aggressive pro-Palestine activists”.
His report, “Protecting Our Democracy from Coercion”, also names pro-Palestinian groups as well as Just Stop Oil and also gets a mention:
Titled Protecting Our Democracy from Coercion, his report was condemned by protest groups, including Greenpeace and Just Stop Oil. They said its proposals, which included a review of undercover surveillance of activists and making protest organisers pay towards policing, would “weaken democracy”.
His report, “Protecting Our Democracy from Coercion”, also names… Just Stop Oil
Yup. Assassins. Yup.
Chinese, Russian and Israelis security services are running through Europe like they own the joint… makes you wonder what European spooks are doing with their time and all that money.
Asking for a friend.
makes you wonder what European spooks are doing with their time and all that money.
Having affairs, smokin’ cubans, and drinkin’ cognac.
[Source: am a spy. But not a very good one.]
at least somebody is living well under these regimes!
Yes, definitely that 👆
He is often a but vague in his conclusions and pronouncements but uses a lot of left-wing groups as his examples, which clearly shows his targets.
The right-wing groups are proscribed so not so easy to track through their public activity, but they seem the biggest threat of a political assassination. However, tagging onto the Trump attempt as a way to push for further restrictions on legitimate protest seems a bit opportunistic.
I wonder if there would be less attempts if there were more politicians who would choose public good over wealth?
The last MP to be murdered was definitely on the side of public good.
I’m not sure I’d call a Thatcherite Tory who was Portillo’s PPS definitely on the side of public good.
I’d forgotten about him, I was referring to Jo Cox.
Aint it really the only time public figures get removed…
Think MLK, JFK etc
Those guys shown the limits of what a person can do before it they get checked by the ruling regime.
https://skwawkbox.org/2024/07/16/israel-lobby-trying-to-outlaw-independent-candidates-and-campaigns/
Right winger that quit the party to avoid investigations over him being a sex pest, and accepted repeated donations from the Israel lobby, wants anti genocide candidates and campaigns banned. I’m shocked.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The UK government’s adviser on political violence said the growth of a “toxic, dangerous environment” in public life increased the risk of there being an assassination attempt on a British politician, as he called on the home secretary to launch an investigation into the intimidation of candidates in the election.
In an interview with the Guardian on Sunday, Woodcock, who has the title Lord Walney, said the apparent attempted murder of Donald Trump was “a vivid reminder of the vulnerability of all politicians”.
The peer called on Cooper and the security minister, Dan Jarvis, to commission a short inquiry to establish whether groups in different constituencies were working together before the 4 July general election.
In his letter to Cooper, Woodcock said there had been a “concerted campaign by extremists to create a hostile atmosphere for MPs within their constituencies to compel them to cave into political demands”.
Woodcock said on Sunday he wanted the home secretary to “call an urgent review of the environment around Whitehall” where “there can be clear points of vulnerability” for MPs – as well as better protections at MP’s offices.
The Labour MP Jess Phillips said she had to make regular calls to the police during the election campaign as her supporters had tyres slashed and were filmed in the street.
The original article contains 932 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
