• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    392 months ago

    USPS sells this information for mail advertising. If you don’t want to be included in that, you can opt out via USPS.

    Fill out Form 1500 and drop it by a post office to be removed from ad lists. It’s free.

    • @CobblerScholar
      link
      292 months ago

      And they wouldn’t have to sell ad space if they actually got funding

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        252 months ago

        A kneecap here, a hobbling there… well USPS, you ain’t lookin so hot. Might need to cut your funding. Again.

        Why the fuck is DeJoy still there again???

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -22 months ago

            I’d rather the post office sell ads than our taxes be increased. Government funding ain’t free and if the USPS can’t support itself financially at least for the most part then it’s incredibly vulnerable to privatization and elimination by Republicans.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              They don’t need to increase taxes, they need to remove the person trying to cripple the USPS and allow it to be properly funded with the billions already collected every year.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                02 months ago

                As a postal contractor I don’t see any evidence of an effort to cripple the USPS from within.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 months ago

      Form 1500 is involving unwanted sexually oriented mail. How does it stop spam? You have to provide specific mailings you want to stop.

      • Sabata
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        That’s like the one piece of mail I may actually look at before throwing out.

    • JWBananas
      link
      English
      92 months ago

      Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article.

      This is about tracking pixels.

      • @braindefragger
        link
        11
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        GOP loves to target useful government programs that help normal folks.

        1. Slash the funding and try to install leaders that may favor GOP policies.
        2. Point to the project and the talk about how poor of a job they’re doing.
        3. Slash the funding again.
        4. Point to the project and the talk about how poor of a job they’re doing.
        5. Slash the funding again.
        6. Point to the project and the talk about how poor of a job they’re doing. …
    • @Confused_Emus
      link
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      A data breach is likely where they got your information from; whether it was this specific one is hard to say (there’s a new one practically every week).

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    102 months ago

    Your postal address is displayed right there at the top of the page when you’re signed in and looking at the “dashboard,” so it’s readily available bold as brass for anyone to scrape. The real question is, why was third party code even allowed to be served with that page? What possible benefit could it serve the user to have Meta and LinkedIn tracking pixels on their postal mail dashboard?

    That was a rhetorical question. The answer is money, and how much of it those social media/tech companies were paying the Postal Service to allow them to do it – end user be damned. The notion that the USPS was “unaware” of this reeks so bad that you could smell it from space.

  • @linearchaos
    link
    English
    62 months ago

    i’d be more shocked if a government agency (outside the DOD) managed NOT to leak my data.

      • @Confused_Emus
        link
        12 months ago

        That very breach is when I started keeping my credit reports frozen, which I highly recommend everyone look into doing.

        • @pwalshj
          link
          22 months ago

          I didn’t know that was a thing. Thanks. I’ll look in to that.

          • @Confused_Emus
            link
            12 months ago

            Many of the credit reporting agencies will try to sell you on a subscription service that includes a credit “lock” feature that’s pretty much the same thing, but all of them are required to offer a free way to freeze your report so don’t let them talk you into it. Unless you’re interested in the other features of the subscription, which can be useful.