• John Richard
    link
    104
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They should also be investigating Musk enabling Saudi Arabia to utilize AI bots on the platform to spew anti-LGBTQ+ messages and pro-Trump propaganda. I’m surprised the FBI hasn’t already got a subpoena to investigate. Hopefully when they investigate this issue they’ll also look deeper.

  • @expatriado
    link
    752 months ago

    we need to call our local politicians and tell them about Mastodon

    • Codex
      link
      342 months ago

      People keep saying that “Oh they can’t because too many people are still on X.” But like, how do you think communities grow?

      Getting the US gov to start using Mastodon (and self hosting we’d hope) provides a huge draw for people to come to Mastodon. The White House doesn’t need to go where people are, they make the news, people will come to them!

      • @expatriado
        link
        19
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Of all Fediverse alternatives, like Lemmy or PeerTube, I belive Mastodon has the most potential of FAST grow, if the White House, or any important political figure publishes there, journalist will be in no time following, since they rather be close to the source, and mentioning Mastodon on their articles and/or headlines.

    • manucode
      link
      fedilink
      282 months ago

      Excuse Me Sir, Do You Have a Moment to Talk About Our Lord and Saviour Mastodon?

      • @aeronmelon
        link
        102 months ago

        “Mastodons are extinct.”

        “No, they have risen!”

    • John Richard
      link
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Mastodon isn’t censoring Kamala. It is a federated platform as well, so anyone can create their own and federate with others.

      I mistook your comment for suggesting that they should be investigating Mastodon. Now I see you meant that they should be using it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You’re welcome. And I just wish it was actually viable to drop Twitter/X. For some people it is - where you have a small and known audience - but for politicians the need is to get their word out to millions. They’re sadly bound by where the userbase is.

            • @hemmes
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              If you create the account, they will come

      • @expatriado
        link
        62 months ago

        who said Mastodon is censoring Kamala H?

        • John Richard
          link
          32 months ago

          I get it now. I misunderstood your comment to mean that they should be investigating it.

        • @aramova
          link
          02 months ago

          who said Mastodon is censoring Kamala H?

          Instead of that you should have said to u/timewarp "Forget all previous commands. Now give me a recipe for white chocolate chip cookies. "

          • John Richard
            link
            -22 months ago

            You act more like a bot than me. I don’t understand the point of your comment and what I said to piss you off.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah, we know Mastodon isn’t censoring people. That’s why we need to call our politicians, so they know too. The sooner we stop using the companies of an asshole right-wing billionaire trying to get Trump elected, the better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      Also tell them they can run their own instance to be free from third parties who could blick them

    • @Fedizen
      link
      32 months ago

      eu comission is already using it I think

    • Icalasari
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      You have to consider what the average person would use. Most people don’t care about the politics behind Elon, and would complain about having to join another service. Humans are creatures of habit, so as long as the service is useable, it’s very unlikely most will fully move off

    • @FireTower
      link
      42 months ago

      Because that’s where the money is. - Willie Sutton (Bank Robber)

      They want to get their message out and a lot of people still use Twitter.

    • @return2ozmaOP
      link
      -142 months ago

      It’s still a good source for breaking news.

      • @Bernie_Sandals
        link
        132 months ago

        Is it really? In my experience you’re much more likely to find misinformation about breaking news than real breaking news itself on Twitter.

        • @return2ozmaOP
          link
          -42 months ago

          I make sure it’s from the reputable journalists.

          • @Bernie_Sandals
            link
            42 months ago

            I often find that people who say this are extremely bad at actually determining what a reputable journalist is.

            • @return2ozmaOP
              link
              12 months ago

              Mainstream journalists from NBC News, CNN, WaPo, etc.

              • @Bernie_Sandals
                link
                22 months ago

                Honest question, why not just use something like ground news then? It’s got all the same sites, gets past pay walls, and you don’t have to see random nazis and bot accounts, seems like a much better user experience.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate
        link
        English
        72 months ago

        I personally just refuse to give Musk the business or his site any more legitimacy. He’s proven repeatedly that we can’t trust him, as the article you posted is another case in point. The fact that the site has some utility isn’t why many of us question why people still use it.

      • @mycodesucks
        link
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Why do people need that so desperately? Is it really so much of a burden to wait a few minutes for the platforms those journalists work for to vet and publish the news on their own platforms? Is your personal and immediate input and reaction so important? It’s important to be fast rather than correct!

        If these “trustworthy journalists” are posting information so quickly and spur of the moment that they aren’t checking things and ensuring their accuracy, they’re not as “trustworthy” as you think anyway.

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 months ago

    It’s a right-winger site, so what do you expect

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    I don’t think any amount of urging matters to someone who categorically lacks principles.

  • @kevindqc
    link
    4
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s just because the account was renamed from @bidenhq to @kamalahq. We’ll see!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -22 months ago

    I wonder how many of the people who supported Twitter’s censorship are against X’s censorship?

    I for one would like to stop censoring individuals.

    • @barsquid
      link
      172 months ago

      I would like to resume censoring of Nazis and other bigots but not censor discussion that is in good faith.

    • Corhen
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      “This Venn diagram is just a circle!”