You must log in or register to comment.
So… they simply settled on a pricetag for breaking the law
And the people who were affected get nothing. This is transactional destruction of our resources between a business and the government.
Furthermore is the money obtained going to used to reverse the effects the event has on the environment? I doubt it.
The article says the city built a water processing plant to help remove stuff including PCBs from the river flow in 2014, before the suit started in 2016.
It’s not enough, but let’s consider the $160 million as repaying the city for that initial capital expenditure.
To be fair I did not read the article, that’s my fault.
Ah yes, the cost of doing business