New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley are introducing bipartisan legislation that would prevent members of the executive and legislative branches — as well as their spouses and children — from trading individual company stocks.

  • @thor_the_fox_sin
    link
    291 year ago

    Great, hope it goes through. But why isn’t the judicial branch included?

    • czech
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I assume if the judicial branch were included it would be found “unconstitutional”. Maybe this has a shot of getting through the supreme court and then we can go from there.

    • QHC
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I agree, but if we can clean up some of the blatant corruption in Congress then maybe the corruption in the SC and elsewhere can also be addressed.

  • Rottcodd
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    I’ll be mildly curious to see how it will fail to pass.

    That it will fail to pass is guaranteed.

    • Uprise42
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Can’t fail if it doesn’t hit the floor. It will get caught in limbo. This will be the last we hear of this

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    IMO every other issue in congress stems from blatant conflict of interest like this, and like donations. To a point where even if youre a single issue voter for something like healthcare, or budget, etc, this is still the first step to resolving your concern. How are drug and health insurance prices ever going to be regulated in favor of those that need it, if representatives financially benefit from doing the opposite?

    People elected to federal government are already entitled to salaries they can comfortably live on. And they should really be living on that exclusively while serving.

    • @stanleytweedle
      link
      31 year ago

      People elected to federal government are already entitled to salaries they can comfortably live on. And they should really be living on that exclusively while serving.

      It’s amazing to me how passionately people I’ve known personally will defend politicians ‘right’ to effectively profit from their service far beyond their salaries. Arguments like “If we don’t let them earn more money talented people won’t enter politics” and “It’s not fair to punish them for being successful”. It’s just insane to me.

      • blazera
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        just one of those symptoms of the belief that only money=success.

        • @stanleytweedle
          link
          11 year ago

          Unfortunately money and success are strongly correlated, it’s just not cause and effect.

      • e_t_
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        “If we don’t let them earn more money talented people won’t enter politics”

        Yeah, that’s why talented people never enter teaching or the sciences. Though, to be fair, I’d be a bit wary of giving power to someone whose passion in life was politics.

  • NotTheOnlyGamer
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Oh, finally! I’m certain it’s going to fall completely on its face, but at least they’re finally acknowledging that the issue exists.

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
    link
    91 year ago

    The only thing bipartisan about this is the knowledge that such a bill will never pass. That’s why these psychos introduce it every so often. Just a publicity stunt.

    • Chrisosaur
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Psychos? I’m sure the publicity doesn’t hurt, but it’s a good policy. There’s been enough shady insider shit to warrant shutting this down.

  • Alto
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Hawley doing something not awful? Has hell frozen over?

    • Unaware7013
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      He knows the bill is dead in the water. No way he’d support something sensible that had a chance of ever seeing bidens desk