• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 month ago

    Again, they’re not stuck, neither indefinitely nor definitely. The return was on hold to give NASA time to study the equipment before it was jettisoned to burn up in atmosphere. They still have resources (power, water, food, air, etc.) in reserve to last a while longer before they have to leave. (And I’m pretty sure that NASA could resupply them anyway.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      291 month ago

      I know I’m arguing semantics here and the rest of your post is probably right but if they unexpectedly don’t have a way to get home right now I think that qualifies as stuck. If there’s no set date where that’s scheduled to change yet they are stuck indefinitely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        20
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They do have a way to get home right now, safely. Their mission was simply changed to staying up longer.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            171 month ago

            The part of the spacecraft that has the issue they’re researching is the part that has already done its job (getting to the space station). That part isn’t needed for the flight home, and in fact, gets jettisoned not long after departure from the station. Thats the reason they haven’t left yet. If they leave, the part of the spacecraft with the problem gets thrown away and they can’t learn anything more from it.

            • @LordCrom
              link
              11 month ago

              Is that correct? I thought the simulations being run were to determine if the leaks posed any potential risk during separation, and triple checked multiple times to ensure safety. I didn’t consider it was for data collection

    • polonius-rex
      link
      fedilink
      221 month ago

      if you say “sorry i’m stuck at work” it doesn’t mean that your boss has literally chained you in place

      • @pycorax
        link
        01 month ago

        Indefinitely implies never being able to go back which is much more similar to your analogy though. Either way, it’s clearly a click bait headline.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          No, indefinitely implies you don’t know when you’ll be able to go back. It does not mean you’re never going back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You are correct; thank you for bringing rationality to something that the media continues to sensationalize.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      They’re having a blast too. It’s even possible this will be the last trip both of them take to ISS.