• @comrade19
    link
    54 months ago

    I used version 1 on poorly optimsed games and it worked so well that i couldn’t notice any disadvantage. Unfortunately it wont work on legion go yet because of their monitor being vertical, but otherwise its perfect for other handhelds.

    • Vik
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Any titles you feel it works particularly well in? Been meaning to use it with 60FPS limited games like tekken 7,8 elden ring and whatever. Worked surprisingly well for me in Valheim in the past.

      • @comrade19
        link
        14 months ago

        Sorry for the late reply! I use it for late game stuff like planet crafter and valheim too, when youve just cluttered the screen with objects and the developers didnt account for it haha.

  • @Jontique
    link
    24 months ago

    I hope someone compares this with the latest DLSS frame gen, would be interesting to see

    • Alphane MoonOPM
      link
      English
      14 months ago

      I am sure the reviews for latest FMR vs DLSS frame gen will be out soon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      in the strict comparison between DLSS and FSR frame gen, (without their upscaling component), Channels that bench it like Ancient Gameplays prefers FSR FG. given that this is itterative over 1.0, it would be reletively safe to say that his opinion wouldnt change.

      everyone agrees that the DLSS upscaling portion is better than FSR/XeSS which is what keeps DLSS and its features relevant.

      no doubt hed benchmark it down the line