A US safety regulator announced Tuesday that it voted unanimously to hold Amazon responsible for faulty or unsafe products sold by third-parties on its website and app.

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission, tasked with ordering companies to recall dangerous products sold in America, said it found more than 400,000 defective products sold on Amazon’s platform that the online retailer now must recall or face legal consequences.

More than 60% of sales in Amazon’s stores come from independent sellers, the company said in January, and the battle over who should be held liable for these products when they fail has been battled in court for years. But the CPSC Tuesday said an administrative law judge sided with the agency, ruling that Amazon acted as a distributor for third-party goods, and the company’s notifications to customers that products they purchased had a “potential” safety issues were insufficient to protect consumers.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    421 month ago

    Unfortunately without Chevron, Amazon will just sue, claiming this regulation is outside their jurisdiction. And they will win.

  • Blaster M
    link
    English
    101 month ago

    No more buying Uranium on Amazon, I guess

    • @Viking_Hippie
      link
      11 month ago

      Nah, so far they’ve had 0 complaints about defective yellow cake uranium, so you can buy just as much of that on Amazon as you already were!

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    11 month ago
    CNN Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    CNN is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

  • BlackLaZoR
    link
    fedilink
    -311 month ago

    The entire thing sounds like shooting the messenger. Why should Amazon be liable for stuff sold by third parties?

    • @CeeBee_Eh
      link
      301 month ago

      Why should Amazon be liable for stuff sold by third parties?

      Even when proven dangerous products are reported to Amazon they continue to sell it.

      Louis Rossman talks about it a lot.

      https://youtu.be/eS698R-bxuc

        • @CheeseNoodle
          link
          English
          91 month ago

          In addition Amazon have that whole system where you buy a product and you just get a random version of that product they have in stock rather than one from the precise seller you ordered from. That takes choice away from the consumer to avoid certain brands which should make Amazon responsible for the outcome if they provide an inferior version of the product ordered.

      • paraphrand
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Also, Amazon is this new form of dominance of the market, and they shouldn’t be able to engineer a system where fault is ambiguous and the buck is passed indefinitely in circles.