• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      612 months ago

      The queue is an auction. Pay an amount you choose to watch the video, view order goes by who paid the most.

        • @clearedtoland
          link
          English
          102 months ago

          This legitimately sounds like a viable app idea. I don’t know jack about bringing it to life but I absolutely see people buying into it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            You want to make real money? Make with porn videos

            If you are already half way there you can’t just wait 10 minutes or you have to restart. You need the next video quickly.

            • @clearedtoland
              link
              English
              21 month ago

              I bet that’d work well in FinDom circles. I know even less about the Porn industry than I do app making but the idea seems viable.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                It’s simple, masturbate till your about 1/2 there… Stop… Tell me how much you would pay to finish…

      • @skyspydude1
        link
        61 month ago

        Funnily enough, this is almost exactly how ads are served to you. Advertisers get your profile, try and figure out how valuable an impression will be, bid against other advertisers, and the winning bid gets to show you the ad. All within the fraction of a second of a page loading.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    612 months ago

    This, but they can monetise it by having a bidding war and you can skip the line in regard of how much you pay.

    Ahh, the capitalist hellscape is coming along nicely.

    • @Valmond
      link
      422 months ago

      Invent a problem and make people pay for not having it.

    • Sabata
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      You can bid on a box that may contain a coveted line skip, or one of over 50,000 emotes and valuable partner discounts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Look at this employee of the month over here! :D

        It’s also practical bcs we don’t have to code shit since there won’t be any chances of winning.

    • @beebarfbadger
      link
      21 month ago

      Or buy booster packs in the store to jump up to ten places per purchase! Booster packs now only 799 Youtube Coins, sold in packs of 798 per pack!

  • NegativeNull
    link
    532 months ago

    It’s the e-book library model (in which a library only has X number of copies of a digital e-book, and you have to wait to get them)

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          41 month ago

          Artificial scarcity of digital goods is a fucking blight.

          • @AeonFelis
            link
            English
            01 month ago

            It’s an outdated business model, but the problem it tries to solve is real. You wouldn’t want the author to be payed for a single copy which the library freely distribute to as many users as it can. And when I say “freely”, I mean it’s free for the library - the readers will pay subscription. And when I say “library”, I don’t mean your local community library - I mean a big company that operates an online library.

            For some reason books are the only media that operates by this model digitally. One would assume it’s because how physical libraries work - but video libraries were a thing, and so were game libraries, and you don’t see online video libraries or game libraries that use this model.

            Maybe it’s because of advertisement? You can easily put ads in books (newspapers always have ads in them), but due to the static nature of books and the complete control the user have on the pace, you can’t force the readers to read your ads.

            At any rate, this is not really scarcity because this model does not actually allow them to inflate the price. The library’s patrons pay a general subscription, so any specific book does not have a price in the library and therefore they can’t raise its price just because the library does not have enough copies of it. And if someone is willing to pay more in order to jump the queue - they can just as easily buy their own digital copy of the book.

      • @ArtVandelay
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Its definitely real for audiobooks. I gave up on one after it said the estimated wait was 17 weeks, and instead sailed the high seas

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    512 months ago

    Jokes on you, using NewPipe I can run YouTube in the background for free. I can just set an alarm for in 297 days instead of waiting. Fools

    • @Shard
      link
      121 month ago

      Ultra premium only allows you to join the express queue with other ultra premium users.

      To skip the queue you need Diamond premium membership and a small fee of $2.

    • @sudo42
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      Like FastPass at theme parks. You pay extra to stand in a shorter queue.

    • @NocturnalEngineer
      link
      141 month ago

      Screenshot fails to show the video attempting to load every 30 seconds. But it then turns out to be an advert.

      Users get the same feeling they get whilst waiting for an agent, and the hold music gets interrupted with “your call is important to us…”

  • @ceenote
    link
    25
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    To save your time for anyone who had the same brainwave I had: Multiplying the length of the Blank Space video by 95,081 gives you 300 days, 10 hrs, 18 minutes and 33 seconds. So the wait time is close. Maybe they’re counting on 1% of people dying during the wait.

    • @Dagnet
      link
      52 months ago

      Nice of them to leave the queue in their last moments

      • @ceenote
        link
        21 month ago

        Actually 2% are expected to die, but only half of them remain in the queue because their phones are plugged in.

  • @HexadecimalSky
    link
    201 month ago

    Maximum concurrent viewers for a given video could be a way to lower stress on YT servers, requiring less servers thus costing less to maintain, thus less ads/more money for creators, at least in a more rational and less greedy world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      If scheduled programming vs on demand was something that channel owners or users could pick for themselves it would be an apocalypse or a new golden age for YouTube.

      Not sure which, but it would sure be different.

  • @voracitude
    link
    151 month ago

    If it’s good enough for public libraries, it’s good enough for corporations!

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    131 month ago

    How about you gotta upload one video to watch one video. If you want to watch a video that has been watched two times you need a video that has been watched two times or a longer by two video that has been watched once, or two equivalent videos watched once time each.

    • IndiBrony
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      That sounds like socialism to me!

      • @werefreeatlast
        link
        21 month ago

        Noh! Socialism is where only one guy works and the rest of us mooch from him.

    • @voracitude
      link
      11 month ago

      How do you get the views before the uploads? 🤔

  • @Raiderkev
    link
    81 month ago

    The Notify Me button is only for premium subscriptions