It all of a sudden became TERRIBLE and now I can’t find anything? When did this happen? Why did this happen?

  • Dettweiler
    link
    8911 months ago

    It’s been progressively getting worse over the past few years as they’ve continued to “optimize” their search engine for more ad placement and sponsored content. I’d say these past few months, it’s become borderline unusable for finding actual information.

    • @Cihta
      link
      4611 months ago

      This is the thing. It really has become unusable. Trying to find obscure information is insane no matter the keywords. It’s always the same results and, ugh, YouTube videos. You can’t find parts for older stuff easily, simple answers are gone.

      Amazon is similar. Change the keywords all you like you still will get the same ‘amazon choice’ products and recommended alternatives for whatever you searched for lead to the same list. But i have to agree it really got worse unreasonably fast last few months.

        • @n1729
          link
          5
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • @Cihta
          link
          29 months ago

          Oh wow i just now saw this reply (thanks boost!) Seems very cool, many thanks!

        • radix
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Thanks for this. Trying it out now.

  • deweydecibel
    link
    5211 months ago

    Define “sudden”.

    This has been a progressively worsening problem for a good while now.

    To be fair to Google, it’s not entirely their fault, there’s a whole industry now that’s entire purpose is to fuck up the results. But even so, Google has absolutelly lost what made it useful. It’s far too concerned with try to curate for you instead of just doing damn search for the words. That helps them get more bullshit and some ads in there.

    • @ultimate_question
      link
      1611 months ago

      To be fair to Google, it’s not entirely their fault, there’s a whole industry now that’s entire purpose is to fuck up the results

      I disagree, Google has encouraged and profited massively off of SEO, they could’ve maintained the integrity of result but instead they bent over backwards to make sure SEO methods worked as long as folks were paying Google

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      Can you explain a little what you mean by “a whole industry now that’s entire purpose is to fuck up the results”? I’ve never heard of that before and it sounds alarming to say the least

      • Hoxton
        link
        1311 months ago

        I’m guessing they meant SEO - Search Engine Optimisation. It’s much more complex than this, but essentially finding high volume search terms and writing website content based around those terms so your page shows up higher organically.

        It’s why recipe pages or simple how to guides have paragraphs semi related text that sounds like it was written by committee. The content needs to be human readable, otherwise Google flags it as spammy, but at the same time it only serves to drive up clicks based on those search terms.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        I’m assuming they’re talking about SEO(search engine optimization). There’s companies that offer it as a service to boost websites rankings so they are closer to the top.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The worsening has definitely been progressive over the last 10 years, but I feel there were some sudden changes over the last couple of months that make it a lot less usable than before. For some searches I get the feeling that there’s some kind of whitelist of websites that are included in the search and a huge part of the internet is being excluded. I was looking for a pretty basic diagram some days ago, nothing too obscure, and there were maybe three dozens of results in the image search. I also find more and more pages that are obviously badly translated English content when I search for German terms. I never had that problem in the past. The same goes for product testing. I tried to find a good office chair, but the websites that claim to test different models obviously try to lead you to one specific product. The texts feel like auto-generated content to simulate real articles about the products being tested, but at the end chair X, and only chair X, is the right one to buy.

  • Gamers_Mate
    link
    fedilink
    3211 months ago

    Google has really gone down hill to the point I can no longer find obscure searches anymore. Even youtube searches sorting by new has gone downhill to the point that most of the results are youtube shorts with half of them having multiple hashtags in the title.

    • at_an_angle
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      I’ve found myself using DDG and Bing (fucking BING!) more than google lately.

    • @JingJang
      link
      411 months ago

      I REALLY wish there was a way to exclude shorts from YouTube results entirely.

    • @x4740N
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      Search operators for YouTube might help with that

  • @gamebuster
    link
    2511 months ago

    It’s because of money. Google is a place where you can find the least irrelevant ad for your search query.

    • @djmarcone
      link
      411 months ago

      I wonder if their CIA money has dried up, maybe funds are tight and they’re forcing the algorithm for all it’s worth. Sorta like how spez is burning reddit to the ground trying to maximize the metrics for the ipo or whatever.

  • @_pete_
    link
    2411 months ago

    It depends on which bit you’re talking about.

    ChatGPT and SEO optimisation ruined the quality of results so sites who have no right to be near the top spot for particular terms get there by cramming as many pages full of tangentially related rubbish as they can.

    The SERPs (search engine result pages, where you see the list of links) have been taken over by Google guessing at what you might be looking for, local results, shopping results, instant answers (which is usually aren’t relevant) and of course lots and lots of ads, leaving little to no room for the actual links you want.

    If you are sick of it I would suggest trying DuckDuckGo, the results are a whole lot nicer :)

    • blubberman
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      DuckDuckGo has some of the same problems too. It is mainly just a proxy for Bing search results. But they are less full of ads and crappy personalisation indeed. Also search.brave.com is worth a try.

      • @x4740N
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        Don’t use anything by brave

  • @marx2k
    link
    2111 months ago

    ComSci here. Lately Google for tech searches, and especially low level shit, gives a few relevant results on top with the bottom of the first page always being scam sites that my corp firewall blocks. Always sites with just random letters

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    I’ve switched to using ChatGPT for simple but weird stuff like “give me a list of verbs to describe bird behaviour” or “what part of the leg can you be hit at by a bullet and have a chance to survive for a few days, using a tourniquet” (I’m a writer, lol). Try to google that, no chance you’ll come up with anything useful.

    • @x4740N
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      Chatgpt doesn’t give factually accurate information

  • Max-P
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    My guess would be that it’s increasingly using AI/ML and natural language over search terms to sort the results, which results in much shittier results. Power users are used to specifying the search term precisely and it no longer does anything about it.

    It tries way too hard to also return news articles and blog posts instead of forum posts and other types of user-generated content. If it can find a plain “well written” english blog it’ll return that over a 10 year old forum post that’s super detailed but full of grammar mistakes. It’s gone full corporate and strongly favors corporate interests and pushes commercial offerings more.

    It used that ads were clearly labeled ads but it wouldn’t surprise me now regular results gets quietly prioritized based on some sort of financial incentives.

    • @MajorHavoc
      link
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think you’re right (and I recall Google engineers have been open about using AI in past press releases.)

      I suspect that Google is on the bleeding edge of what happens when a bunch of AIs try to convince other AIs to pick their schlop over the next schlop over. Very few of the involved parties are still focused on helping people (it’s hard to get an AI to focus on anything) and it’s starting to show.

  • @Klear
    link
    1511 months ago

    Are you sure it’s true? I tried googling it and didn’t find anything…

    • @Noodle07
      link
      1411 months ago

      Funny how much better google is when you block any Pinterest answer

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Google needs to present growing profit for their shareholder. But ad revenue can only grow if you are alle to sell new ads. But there are not any new ideas for ads (like adWord etc) therefore they go down the road of „more ads“ to keep growing. What they needed was a new idea to offer another ad-concept that user liked and companies would pay for. But that did not happen. Goggle basically stopped innovating.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        511 months ago

        As I understand it the fundamental problem is that capital gains (via the increase of share value) is taxed less than income (via dividends). So shareholders want companies whose share values increase rather than companies that pay dividends, which is why there’s the “need” for companies to always eternally grow.

        If those taxes were more balanced then there’d be more of a niche for companies that get “big enough” and then just sit at that size steadily turning a nice profit year after year to give to their shareholders.

  • @secondaccountlemmy
    link
    811 months ago

    Yeah… Cant provide an answer why probably ads. I had very good search terms and it should be the first hit but it just resulted in crap. Currently using duckduckgo and i got the first link that i was searching for correctly. Not looking back anymore.

  • @kemsat
    link
    611 months ago

    I’ve mostly been using DuckDuckGo for the last few years so I haven’t noticed. I mostly only use Google for Google Translate & YouTube.

    • mariom
      link
      English
      411 months ago

      deepl is even better than gtranslate, IMHO

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        I still mainly use deepl, but Google translate has made some impressive progress in the past few years and I’d say they’re pretty even now.

  • @habanhero
    link
    611 months ago

    Do a search on mobile and you need to scroll through an ENTIRE SCREEN full of ads (4-5) to get to the first result. And even that might be SEO’d. That’s the current sad state of affairs.