cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/15032962

Alt text: a screenshot of a microblog post with the text “you walking down an alleyway with a gram of weed in your pocket, who would you rather catch you?” Below are two pictures side by side. One of Kamala Harris and the other of Batman.

  • @teamevil
    link
    English
    643 months ago

    Better than an dumbass orange fascist any day

      • @teamevil
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It absolutely did, and your response is disingenuous…the only reason to try and say she is a shitty cop is to discourage voters, which helps a fascist. Assuming your not a troll you’re stupid or lying with your willfull ignorance of the statement underlying message

        Edit… I am an Idiot and didn’t realize I had stumbled into Anarchism…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Ah yes the lemmy.world user reminding us that making fun of the “left-wing” candidate makes you a right winger. Have you considered that making fun of Liberals is one of the most left wing things one could do, unless the only reason why you’re in this Anarchist community is to spread Liberalism and tell people to vote for the “right people”. Yeah im sure if you bootlick the capitalists and blindly obey them like a puppy they’ll give you their tablescraps and a pat on the head.

          • @teamevil
            link
            English
            13 months ago

            Hey White flag…my dumbass absolutely didn’t look at which community I was in, you’re absolutely right especially in Anarchism…I was out of line and an absolute asshole. My apologies, I am the stupid one.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              That’s fine, next time if you see that you’re in a left wing community avoid talking like a Liberal.

          • Superb
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Don’t vote for candidate X is still electioneering?

            • @[email protected]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              Have I told you don’t vote for candidate X? Or did I criticize a politician? Did I say tactical voting is the big poo poo? Why does criticizing a politician cause so many to reflectively defend them?

              • Superb
                link
                fedilink
                English
                43 months ago

                why does criticizing a politician cause so many to [reflexively] defend them?

                Probably because they disagree with you?

                To be clear I agree with your criticisms, Kamala is 100% a cop. I disagree with you banning anyone who uses the word “vote” in their disagreement.

                Kamala is the democratic candidate for president, anytime we talk about her we’re implicitly talking about the election. You can’t then turn around and ban anyone who then brings up the election. You brought it up first!

                If you think “Kamala sucks” posts aren’t electioneering then I don’t know how to help you.

                • @[email protected]OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I’ve not been banning people just for the word vote, I’ve been banning people for telling others to vote or who to vote for.

                  Do you really expect an anarchist space to have a rule against criticizing members of the political class?

                  This community was created because users where concerned an other community was going to drop a similar rule, this community has been growing since it started so there are people that I’m assuming do approved of the rules.

                  I will throw you a bone, I’ve rewriten the rule & it will include telling people not to vote. I’m not going to tell anarchist they can’t criticize a member of the political class.

                  As someone who was a politico/political activist(seeing the sausage cracked out made me an anarchist), minding the people who are already committed supporters, phone banking to remind people to vote, taking people to voting polls, & calling people who’s mail in ballets have been rejected so they can fix it, is going to be far more effective then browbeating randos online about the lesser evil.

  • @qooqie
    link
    English
    583 months ago

    Said this to the other poster of this shit before getting banned. Who in Russia sent you this? Just wondering where the propaganda farms are there

      • @qooqie
        link
        English
        183 months ago

        Fair, but this feels like it’s really grasping for anything to try and paint Kamala in a bad light and that screams bot farm.

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          it’s really grasping for anything

          Absolutely not! It’s like the lowest hanging fruit of a bountiful tree of evil she’s a part of. Anarchists also have a long history of advocacy for the abolition of police, so again this kind of rhetoric coming from actual humans should not come as a surprise.

        • southsamurai
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          In most communities, I’d agree. But in an anarchist community, especially this C/, the only thing I’d be surprised at is that the meme is stale. This place is usually pretty fresh on the meme train.

          Tbh, most of the blahaj political C/s, you can essentially not worry much about farming. There’s really not going to be any posts of the usual propaganda subjects that would be out of the norm for the various communities. I’m mostly a lurker on blahaj, but it’s pretty damn lefty friendly overall.

          No bullshit, just lurk for a while and it’ll be easy enough to see.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 months ago

        Anarchism has a long history of [advocating for abstentionism]

        Yup. And a long history of being ineffectual in making changes on a societal level because of it. Statistically, it’s equivalent to supporting the worst outcomes and building roadblocks to achieving the sustainable systems necessary to support humanity while dismantling unjust hierarchies. Anti-electoralism is so fallacious with the data for context that it nearly seems like a right-wing ploy to suppress leftist voices.

        In fact, this meme is really on-point for this perennial problem and regular Denying the Correlative (“vote third party”). The realistic version would be “which person would you rather meet in an alley when you have drugs on you: a former prosecutor, a nazi, or an imaginary character bourgeois character with Superman Syndrome that isn’t a real choice but counts in favor of the Nazi.”

        Too many fellow anarchists are happy in their ivory towers, pretending that inaction isn’t a choice, and choosing ideological purity over using every tool in the box to keep the patient from dying while treating the sickness. There’s more than enough of us to overwhelm the Right.

        • @[email protected]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I don’t tell people to vote or not, people can make that decision themselves, I’m not their master(I keep that in the bedroom). I was a politico/activist, I did a hell of a lot more then vote every couple of years. I became an anarchist because of all of the subtile out in the open corruption that I saw. If voting could produce substantial reform it would have been made illegal. There is never an appropriate time for holding anyone accountable, during the primaries everyone says we can’t support a reform candidate because they’ll loss in the general, we have to support the nominee because other side bad, & we can’t have change next election because other side bad. If you never hold anyone accountable for their actions why would they ever change? I’m not saying tactical voting is useless but blind support for a political establishment is dangerous. People are so afraid of other side that they bend over backwards to not view their politicians critically & the two parties in general are a lot closer on policy then people like to think. The fact I get so much angry push back for even minor critisism is evidence that people have let themselves be cooped. The more corrupt & brutal police departments are in Democratic strongholds. We just had the largest most sustained anti police protest in history & all of the reforms have been largely cooped or underminded & rolled back & now we have a former prosecutor who defended corrupt police & other corrupt prosecutors who has been ordained the new candidate with no real candidate electoral process. An across the board Democratic landslide would have it’s own pitfalls. The Democrats efforts on gun control will disproportionately effect marginalized people because gun control always has. The Stop & Frisck program is a good example of the harm gun control policies have. Only two percent of the stops found guns, POC & trans women where grossly over represented & NY cops were allowed to arrest women in possession of condoms for prostetution. Harris as a prosecutor prosecuted non violent gun possession cases harshly, a subset of those cases would have been marginalized people who had a gun only for self defense. I honesty think mutual aid activism is far more productive then spending time trying to get people to vote.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Bro I’ve literally donated my own money to people killing Russian invaders. But yes everyone who criticizes your favorite politician is a Russian bot & using that card to try to shutdown even the smallest critisism of those in power doesn’t have a corrosive affect on political discourse in the west thereby serving Putin’s aims.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)
      link
      English
      143 months ago

      As much fun as it is to go that route, most farms today are run out of China and India. I mean there are still putinbots but not nearly in the numbers there was in 2016.

      They’re all pushing similar frameworks so it doesn’t matter as much where they originate from, they are all using the same playbook.

      • @qooqie
        link
        English
        33 months ago

        Oh that’s interesting. I suppose the war is draining too much of Russian resources?

  • @Broken_Monitor
    link
    English
    373 months ago

    Pretty sire she’s not a cop sooooooo

    Its still batman, he’s got bigger things to worry about

      • @Alexstarfire
        link
        English
        293 months ago

        Which part of that was her being a cop?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          93 months ago

          The part where she prosecuted poor black parents because their children missed school when they were sick in the hospital?

          • @Alexstarfire
            link
            English
            113 months ago

            Cops don’t prosecute people. Lawyers do.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              63 months ago

              Do you have anything of value to contribute to the discussion, or is your sole issue that Kamala Harris has not ever actually served on a police force?

              • @Alexstarfire
                link
                English
                93 months ago

                If somehow not serving on a police force makes you a cop then I guess we’re all bastards.

                And yes, that’s really my sole issue. I didn’t think it was going to be controversial to point out that she wasn’t a cop.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  You do understand that we say “ACAB” because it’s catchier than “I dislike the so-called justice system that does nothing but destroy lives for the state, and that includes cops, lawyers, prosecutors, etc.”, (IDTSCJSTDNBDLFTSATICLPE) right?

                  I bet you also say things like “You can’t call everyone you don’t like a nazi, the nazi party ended decades ago!”

                  I say this with all the kindness in my heart, please log off and go outside.

            • Superb
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              No, prosecutors prosecute. Prosecutors are not literally cops (duh), but they are a very important part of the criminal ”justice” system. Cops couldn’t put people away without their help

            • Jackie's Fridge
              link
              English
              23 months ago

              Appreciate the links but that was 7+ years ago. What are her stances now?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                93 months ago

                She keeps telling us that we should vote for her because of her record as a prosecutor and Attorney General so apparently what she did in those roles is what she thinks is important.

              • @Alexstarfire
                link
                English
                43 months ago

                You replied to the wrong person.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)
        link
        English
        213 months ago

        And her opposition is a fascist, a felon, a liar, and a seditionist who hero worships dictators.

        The choice is clear.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          That doesn’t make her less of a cop though. I don’t even understand your response. You get mad at people trying to push for progress because… Trump is a fascist? I don’t know, your argument doesn’t make sense.

          My choice is easy, because I’m unable to vote due to voter disenfranchisement! But even without that, I’m a chronically ill trans person. I’m unable to get my basic, uncontrolled medication or my HRT because of regressive transphobic and ableist policies that are being made every single day. I don’t really care if it’s Trump or Harris overseeing the trans people being murdered, unhoused, and forced to go without health care.

          Exercise your vote how you wish, but voting is the bare minimum and some of us can’t even do it. Go buy a trans person a pizza or a night in a motel if you want to make the world a materially better place.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            enforcing a ‘don’t talk about voting ever, only encourage not voting’ anarchist community is sus af. not voting isn’t gonna make the govt disappear. not voting is just laying down and saying ‘do with me what you will’. not voting, especially from anarchists, inevitably gives more weight to explicitly fascist votes. i’d like a world without goverment as well, but we aren’t gonna get there not voting nor by banning people from anarchist spaces who advocate for slowing the rise of more violent fascism. material conditions, bud.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 months ago

              enforcing a ‘don’t talk about voting ever, only encourage not voting’ anarchist community is sus af.

              Yeah… That kind of action does not really say “acting in good faith” or seem like supporting anarchic philosophy.

                • nickwitha_k (he/him)
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  33 months ago

                  “Anarchism is when vote”

                  In some forms, when needed, yes. See: anarcho-syndicalism.

                  What is contrary to most anarchic philosophy is using power over others to suppress voices that express dissent in good faith. In fact, I can’t think of a branch of anarchism where that’s not outright contradictory to central tenets of the philosophy.

            • @[email protected]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              Yes totally that one rule in this little corner of Lemmy is totally the driving force behind the rise of fascism.

            • Superb
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              This is the same problem that libertyhub has, its sus as hell there too.

              I get not wanting straight propaganda or canvassing, but no one is allowed to push back when you say don’t vote? Its just sucks :/

              • @[email protected]OPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Who said don’t vote?

                Edit: I don’t tell people to or not to vote you’re all grown up people that can decided that for yourselves.

      • @friend_of_satan
        link
        English
        9
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        A gram of weed would get you a citation at most in SF back then, but most likely some “get that high school shit out of here” comment.

        Source: I lived in SF back then and had friends who had nearly that exact experience.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 months ago

    North American folks cannot dismantle the two-party system (TPS) by attacking just one side.

    Criminalisation of drugs is older than the current climate of the TPS as its rooted in racism, classism and ableist healthcare.

    Kamala H. and Donald T. don’t deserve this kind of detailled attention from or in the anarchist sphere, continent-rulers are at most tools or enemies.

  • Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 months ago

    How would either know what’s in my pocket?

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        Harris isn’t (and wasn’t) a beat cop and since when does Batman stop and frisk?

        • @[email protected]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah she was a prosecutor which in many ways is worse, prosecutors are at the center of much of what is wrong with the system, prosecutors may not be the ones on camera beating people but they ruin a lot of lives, families, & communitoes. Because of various laws passed over decades that prosecutors pushed for prosecutors have far more discretion(& therefore power) then judges.

          When we says she’s a cop we don’t mean she ran around with a gun & handcuffs(minus the exercise of power I’m all for people carrying both guns & kink exseseries, you gotta be prepared) we’re saying she was an integral part of a system of power that is central to the marginalization of vulnerable populations.

          • Ech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 months ago

            So she wouldn’t stop me “in an alley”. Got it. You can see how comparing her to Batman isn’t really very helpful for anyone, yeah?

              • Ech
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                When they’re this misleading and incorrect? Sure.

                • @[email protected]OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  23 months ago

                  You’re being needlessly pedantic, Harris isn’t a cop in the same way Trump isn’t a member of the Fascist party. I think you would know what someone means when they call Trump a fascist.

  • Iapar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    I’d rather meet Batman than some politician.

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    Eh, I think I’d enjoy the conversation with the Bat more. Dude can be reasonable in most of his versions. If he’s coming at me over weed, which would just mean I was taking it to someone as a favor since I don’t/can’t use the stuff, I kinda doubt he’s going to be all physical right out of the gate.

    Harris would be boring as fuck all.