• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      GM: it rolls to attack. Oh that’s a 2

      Player: PFF easy

      GM: for a total of 47, dealing 70 damage and you are grabbed.

      GM: for its other 5 attacks …

      My favourite is its reflect ability. If the players pull some meta bullshit like dropping tungsten rods from orbit the tarrasque can just play an uno reverso card and nuke the players.

      • @ninjabard
        link
        234 months ago

        3.5’s tarrasque also had a reflective carapace.

      • @Archpawn
        link
        34 months ago

        I’m not a fan of the reflect ability. It’s just immunity, but a bit worse if the party doesn’t know about it ahead of time.

        It would be much more interesting if it didn’t negate attacks it fails to reflect.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      I had the idea to do the reverse and throw the 5e Tarrasque at my players in my PF2e when they are around level 8* or so. Basically using one of the most powerful DnD bosses as a mid level side boss.

      * I haven’t done the exact math yet

  • ...m...
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Flee, Mortals! - Goxomoc

    …i’m sure someone has published a complete guidesheet between MCDM’s creature names and the D&D creatures they’re intended to replace, but that’s their tarrasque and it’s properly formidable…

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      154 months ago

      I’m gonna be honest, having fought Goxomoc and won (including the other version of it, whatever that was called), it really just cemented for me how much I dislike Flee, Mortals’ design habits. Everything it does feels like it was built to make player abilities not do what they’re supposed to do. It’s like instead of making the monster match the players, they just turn off player features at random instead

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        Oof. I wouldn’t like that at all. I’m already bothered with how many player powers just shut off certain parts of the game. Also putting it on the monster side seems like it will make the game an arms race of things not mattering.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          84 months ago

          “DC 27 Dex save or get teleported 90 ft away, and also it has a reaction to teleport 20 ft away when it gets hit” felt like a massive middle finger to all barbarians and most fighters and paladins

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Really? That second teleport ability sounds super fun. It means the players have to run around the battlefield fighting the monster, and interacting with the terrain, not just standing in front of each other trading blows. Plus it only happens once a round anyway so you can strategize around it.

            The first ability also sounds super cool. At that level there are ways around these things anyway. The friendly casters may have teleports of fly spells, players have dimension door and other crazy abilities from their various magic items they’ve collected for 20 levels, and a DC 27 save at that level probably isn’t that hard to hit anyway.

            Just goes to show how subjective fun is I suppose because that description makes me more excited to fight that then the standard bag of hit points 5e tarrasque.

            • Skua
              link
              fedilink
              54 months ago

              The second ability would be fine on its own, but combined with the other one it means that strength-based melee characters (the aforementioned barbarians, fighters, and paladins) barely get to play the encounter. While there are more ways to make saves as you level up, when the DC is 27 you’d better have proficiency in that save or you literally can’t make it. There is no way to boost all of your saves that high in 5E. DC 27 is just “if this isn’t one of your class stats, you fail”. Especially when the paladin buffing your saves is one of the most likely to have been teleported 90 ft away last time.

              If you’re the fighter in plate armour, well either have fun spending every other round dashing back towards the fight and not hitting anything, or have fun feeling like a liability because the casters have to keep spending their turns and resources just to get you back in the fight. And you’d better have 20 ft of movement left if you actually do hit it too, which you don’t because you only just made it back into melee. It feels like the entire encounter is telling you that you’re an idiot for wanting to play a guy in armour.

              Obviously if you find it fun, I’m not about to tell you that you’re wrong to do so. That’s just subjectivity for you, as you said. I do think it’s good for monsters to counter specific classes sometimes, but when it’s something like Goxomoc, which is two CR 30 creatures in one, that’s basically the only thing you’re doing that day. Being hard-countered all day is just not playing.

              I agree with you that 5E’s tarrasque is dull. Personally my go-tos for fun high CR statblocks are Fizban’s greatwyrms and Glory of the Giant’s scions. They’ve got all sorts of nasty abilities. They just don’t feel like they’re laser-targeting specific players in the party, and the harder control effects are typically slightly more avoidable with proper tactics and builds.

  • @Jarix
    link
    84 months ago

    I like add2e Tarasque

    Reduce it to -100 hp and then use a wish spell to (temporarily) finish it off

  • @Archpawn
    link
    54 months ago

    Does anyone actually run an unmodified 5e tarrasque? Outside of a joke campaign?

    • @Archpawn
      link
      34 months ago

      I want to see a campaign where you have to protect an endangered tarrasque from a group of aarakocra that are trying to poach it.