A survey of the Dolmen of Menga suggests that the stone tomb’s Neolithic builders had an understanding of science.

The Neolithic farmers and herders who built a massive stone chamber in southern Spain nearly 6,000 years ago possessed a good rudimentary grasp of physics, geometry, geology and architectural principles, finds a detailed study of the site.

Using data from a high-resolution laser scan, as well as unpublished photos and diagrams from earlier excavations, archaeologists pieced together a probable construction process for the monument known as the Dolmen of Menga. Their findings, published on 23 August in Science Advances1, reveal new insights into the structure and its Neolithic builders’ technical abilities.

  • @[email protected]English
    15•3 months ago

    Not to diminish either the abilities of the builders or the sincerity of the researchers, it strikes me that there’s sort of an anthropic principle dynamic going on here…

    That this structure exhibits sound building techniques essentially goes without saying, since it’s still standing. If it didn’t, it wouldn’t be, so researchers wouldn’t be able to study it and draw countervailing conclusions from it.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)English
      8•3 months ago

      Based on the article, it sounds like they actually did have a basic understanding of sound building techniques because they went above and beyond the basics by doing things like carving sockets into the bedrock.

      However that doesn’t mean they all gathered around a table, broke out their blueprints, calipers, slide rules and abacuses to design a structure that would last millenia. As you’re implying, there are likely many others that didn’t last that long.

      My very uneducated speculation is that the ones still standing were later ones built after they’d already had a lot of practice building things. There were likely tens or hundreds of them that didn’t last because they were still figuring out how to build structurally stable buildings.

  • @kippinitrealEnglish
    5•3 months ago

    I feel articles like this give off “alien must have built the pyramids” energy. We’ve always been smart, but what modern civilizations have is systematic recording, organization & dispersal of gained knowledge with an amazing efficiency. I think a great example of great ingenuity lost is roman concrete, recipe for which was only recreated recently.

    Can anyone tell me the academic benefit of studying/publishing ancient building techniques that confirm modern day methods? Should we not look for unknown/unfamiliar techniques that might have been lost to time?