• @flossdailyOP
    link
    591 year ago

    Prosecutors wanted a December 2023 start date. They admitted that this date was “aggressive”.

    Trump wanted to push the start date until after the election (so that he could appoint an attorney general that would dismiss the case).

    The very pro-Trumo judge set the trial date for May 2024. I guess the national spotlight and her previous wrist slap from the higher court compelled her to not make the worst possible decision today.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      351 year ago

      This has made me realize that the presidential election is not this November. I’m already exhausted.

      • @flossdailyOP
        link
        371 year ago

        I dunno. If you can allow yourself to forget that we’re riding a razor edge, where the future of our democracy, secular society, and the livability of the planet are at stake, the election news is really quite entertaining.

    • @tburkhol
      link
      241 year ago

      May is after all of 2024’s primary races, so this date ensures that GOP voters won’t know the outcome and won’t even have to think about the trial. IMO, this is about the most pro-Trump decision she could have made.

      • @c0c0c0
        link
        211 year ago

        Let’s be honest: GOP primary voters do not care about the outcome of this trial.

  • Drunemeton
    link
    English
    171 year ago

    Nine months!?

    Well that’s good because I think we all know once that time runs out Trump’s attorneys will be ready to go, and won’t even think of trying to stall even more. Right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Trump will just fire his lawyers weeks before the trial and demand a delay to find new ones. Rinse and repeat.

    • @grabyourmotherskeys
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I think the hope is new people will have passed the bar exam in Florida so he’ll be able to get a lawyer.

    • @ClanOfTheOcho
      link
      81 year ago

      All the better to claim the DOJ is interfering with elections. Ug. I just threw up a little in my mouth.

    • @jeffw
      link
      71 year ago

      Kinda right smack-dab in the middle. Perfect set up to allow a convicted felon to be a major party nominee

      • @LetMeEatCake
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The primary will almost certainly be de facto decided by the end of March. There’s a good chance it will be de facto over by mid February, if any candidate dominates the early states.

        Of the 2467 delegates up, 1250 of them will have been distributed by March 12. Republicans rules on delegate distribution heavily favor the candidate in the lead as well. No primaries/caucuses have been scheduled yet after March 12, but expect the bulk of the remainder to be in the other half of March and all of April.

        The primary is all but certain to be over by May 2024.

        • @Mirshe
          link
          51 year ago

          And I’m sure they’re all banking on Trump to win so they can pull the “you can’t run a major court trial with a presidential nominee as the defendant” card.

    • @Nobody
      link
      01 year ago

      Trump could clench the nomination in March, then get disqualified from running in May. The GOP will have to slap together a quick Desantis, Pence, or Cruz campaign with zero cash, while Trump fights the disqualification in the appellate courts.

      • @aseriesoftubes
        link
        91 year ago

        How would he be disqualified? A candidate could run a campaign from prison if he or she wanted to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          An interesting thought, and completely unrelated to the May trial, but it’s possible that the upcoming J6 indictment could include certain conspiracy charges that would prohibit holding office if convicted. I think the timing of that trial will be more important.

          • Bipta
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Possible but unlikely. I really hope so though or why do we even have the laws?

      • @jeffw
        link
        31 year ago

        Oh no, won’t anyone think of the poor fasc-err… republicans!

      • @ashok36
        link
        21 year ago

        It’s worse: If Trump is the nominee you just know he’s going to spend all the campaign dollars on lawyers for his various trials. He’ll do his usual tour of the states doing his rallies but exactly zero dollars will make their way to downstream candidates. He’s going to cost them the presidency, the house, and the senate.

        At least I hope so.