Ubuntu Core Desktop is an immutable distro, takes a different path than most other immutable distros.

  • The entire OS is built using snaps, including the kernel and bootloader
  • Uses snaps instead of flatpak
  • Prefers LXD over distrobox and other projects that use podman
  • @TheGrandNagus
    link
    English
    125 months ago

    This honestly seems like one of the only things Snaps could be useful for in the future, considering you can update every component of the system with Snaps in a way that you can’t with Flatpaks.

    That said, I still dislike Snaps and I think it would overall be better for Ubuntu to use the standard packaging format that everybody else seems to be converging on; Flatpaks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      Canonical’s been selling commercial support for Ubuntu Core for a while now. Why would they abandon it if it’s working?

  • @markstos
    link
    115 months ago

    As a former Ubuntu user, I’m more likely to try Fedora Silverblue at this point.

    I like Podman so swapping it out for LXD isn’t compelling.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      05 months ago

      Yeah just… Why? Why all those devices? Why auch a mess?

      Snap and systemd are the worst things to happen to Linux. Both in Basic, maybe, not a bad idea but the implementation is horrible

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    65 months ago

    I’m genuinely curious about it. I don’t like snaps, but it seems like an interesting concept.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    45 months ago

    snap

    Aaaaaand we’re done here. Fuck snap, no, bad dog!

  • kbal
    link
    fedilink
    35 months ago

    Immutable IoT thin-client Snap container-based systems seems like a pretty weird kink, but who am I to judge?