The US has a “biblical” duty to support Israel’s annexation of the occupied West Bank, former US President Donald Trump’s ambassador to Israel argues in a new book, unveiling a plan for “one Jewish state" that he said he would share with Trump.

“President Trump has often said that he was indifferent to one state or two states - whatever the parties might agree to,” former US ambassador David Friedman writes in the book, One Jewish State: The Last, Best Hope to Resolve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.

“His goals always were practical and targeted toward tangible improvements in the quality of life. I believe that if Israel will support this plan, he will as well,” according to a copy of the book obtained by The Forward.

Friedman argues the US should support Israel’s annexation “based first and foremost on biblical prophecies and values”, saying that such a policy “hearkens back to basic Judeo-Christian values of kindness, human dignity, humility and prosperity”.

Friedman told The Forward he will share his annexation plan with Trump “at the appropriate time”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    493 months ago

    Judeo-Christian values of kindness, human dignity, humility and prosperity

    Islam is also an Abrahamic religion.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      283 months ago

      And they couldn’t give less of a shit about the Judeo part.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
        link
        fedilink
        English
        313 months ago

        Or the Christian for that matter. “Judeo-Christian” is code for the colonizer cultures with Western European origins.

  • @LovingHippieCat
    link
    303 months ago

    “Biblocal prophecies,” you say? Hmm. What prophecy in the Bible pertains to what’s supposed to happen when Jews are in complete control of the Holy Land? It couldn’t possibly be that they believe they need to support Israel so that Armageddon happens and they get raptured up into heaven, could it?

    Nah. That’d be completely irrational and would show that the people who believe that have no right to be deciding policy for the future of the planet since they’re planning on leaving it as soon as possible.

  • @drunkpostdisaster
    link
    273 months ago

    And yet people kept calling biden genocide Joe as if this was not the alternative at the time.

    • @LinkerbaanOP
      link
      -93 months ago

      Would be very convenient if Trump was in charge right now. But hey, somehow Democrats can project their crimes on Republicans.

        • @AbidanYre
          link
          English
          43 months ago

          And will be again if the gEn0cidE Joe dipshits have their way.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            Yes, holding Dem politicians to account is truly wrong, you should only do that to the other side.

            • @AbidanYre
              link
              English
              63 months ago

              If you think letting trump win will convince Democrats to move left or will reduce the amount of suffering in the world, I’m not sure what to tell you.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  So you go online and sow chaos and discord among those of us who actually grew out of our edgy teen years?

                  Humans are machines for making the world worse, I don’t expect anything different.

                  So deep…

        • @LinkerbaanOP
          link
          -33 months ago

          And we were promised Trump would be doing the Genocide that Genocide Joe is doing right now.

          Apparently crimes only matter when Republicans do them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No, he wouldn’t be “doing the genocide that genocide Joe is doing right now.” It would have been/will be far far far worse.

            Do you think the act of genocide only has two states, on and off?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    193 months ago

    Friedman argues the US should support Israel’s annexation “based first and foremost on biblical prophecies and values”, saying that such a policy “hearkens back to basic Judeo-Christian values of kindness, human dignity, humility and prosperity”.

    It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad and ironic.

  • @nikaaa
    link
    153 months ago

    … hearkens back to basic Judeo-Christian values of kindness, human dignity, humility and prosperity.

    says the Republican

  • @Treczoks
    link
    143 months ago

    “Biblical Duty”? I’ve actually read the bible. Twice. The word “America” was not mentioned anywhere.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      It used to be spelled in a kaleidoscope of native american languages. Have you tried searching for biblical treaties?

      • @Treczoks
        link
        23 months ago

        It used to be spelled in a kaleidoscope of native american languages.

        What do these have to do with the Bible?

        Have you tried searching for biblical treaties?

        What kind of “treaties”? Or is that some kind of Evangelical junk dribble?

  • @eran_morad
    link
    143 months ago

    This guy has a biblical duty to fuck off and die.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      43 months ago

      And a constitutional one too.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    143 months ago

    He said one Jewish state for a reason. And it isn’t a “one state solution” reason. It’s the reason so many evangelicals support Israel: they want to banish all Jews in the world to Israel because they think that’s one of the steps needed to bring Jesus back.

    One massive global ethnic cleansing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      Soviet Russia tried that. Didn’t stop people believing in Christianity. And their anti-theist government wasn’t exactly perfect.

      Maybe human ideology is the issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Tell that to the Russian Orthodox Church! But I definitely agree that humans are ultimately the problem… with everything.

    • @LinkerbaanOP
      link
      73 months ago

      China did that. They built some vocational centers in Xinijang to “re-educate” religious people. That sure solved everything.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -33 months ago

        One day you’re standing up for China, and the next you’re kicking it around. I’m beginning to think you just like talking shit to cause trouble. 😘

    • @Kbobabob
      link
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You don’t need to ban it. Just ignore it. Take away their voice from government, like it was supposed to be.

      • @linearchaos
        link
        English
        33 months ago

        Ehhh maybe stop killing people using it as the scapegoat? We’re kind of flexible.

  • nifty
    link
    3
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t think we should be taking advice on anything from religious people. It simply doesn’t make sense to listen to people who are delusional at best, and maniacal at worst

    Edit and I think it’s inherently antisemitic to say that the only reason the Jewish people deserve a homeland is because of religion. No, Jews deserve a place to call their own, and it’s fair that it should be where it is currently because of their historic ties to the region. Neighboring ME countries should accept it and move on. The rise of Zionism had, and still has, roots in European antisemitism, so I don’t believe this Judeo Christian fraternity for a second.

  • @not_that_guy05
    link
    23 months ago

    It’s ok Arabs that say they won’t vote for Harris. Here you go. Take the other edge of the sword and just sign your own death warrant.

  • @WaxedWookie
    link
    13 months ago

    Well they’re busy shitting all over the constitution, democracy, the rule of law, common fucking decency, common sense, voters, and the English language - the establishment clause was bound to catch some splatter.