• @NarrativeBear
    link
    232 months ago

    When there is even a inkling of doubt a person should not be executed.

    • @breetai
      link
      252 months ago

      Or how about we just don’t execute people? I find the practice a little pointless and barbaric.

      • @VelvetStorm
        link
        -102 months ago

        Some people don’t deserve to live.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 months ago

          And some don’t deserve to die. Can you give it to them? Then don’t be so quick to deal out death and judgement.

          • @VelvetStorm
            link
            -32 months ago

            Can I give what to who? I’m not 100% following here.

            • @Yucky_Dimension
              link
              132 months ago

              Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.

              -Gandalf the Grey

              That’s what the post is referring to.

        • @Ibaudia
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          Humans shouldn’t be the ones to decide that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Yeah, no. That’s not how morality works. People have an inherent right to life regardless of how you feel. Ending that life is a violation of that right, as long as that life is of a human. So the options are either don’t kill people, or dehumanize people, and neither of those a good society makes.

          • @VelvetStorm
            link
            12 months ago

            No, I disagree. People like Hitler, which is who I was thinking about when I made my original comment, don’t deserve to live and you won’t change my mind on that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              As long as he was in power and able to cause havoc, then he’s that’s self defense. As soon as (if history had taken a different turn) he was imprisoned and no longer a threat to anyone, his life is as valued as anyone else’s. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t have to face consequences, just ones that aren’t murder.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You can never in a million years be 100% certain.

      Not even if you see it with your own eyes.

      It is the argument why civilized countries removed the death penalty entirely.

  • @Mango
    link
    122 months ago

    Innocence never mattered to them. It matters to the government and ruling class as much as fake reviews on Amazon matters to Amazon. Control is perception.

  • @Ibaudia
    link
    English
    72 months ago

    Grisham said he was keen to get involved in the campaign to save Roberson’s life because “I just have a real anger at these cases. . .

    Cases, plural. This guy has seen this stuff before. Why does the death penalty still get so much public support when the courts are so corrupt and dysfunctional?

  • @buddascrayon
    link
    2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve just spent the last half hour hour and a half reading this linked article about Todd Willingham that was referenced at the end of the posted article.

    I cannot fucking believe how horrid the justice system in Texas is. You couldn’t pay me to live there. And quite frankly at this point I don’t think I feel safe visiting such a place.

    Edit: I had not realized how exactly long it had taken to read that article. It’s not a short read.