• @hemmesOP
      link
      English
      272 months ago

      Neither the MacTrast nor the original 9to5 article discusses the security behind Apple’s iOS implementation. But we know all firmware packages are signed and I would imagine this would be no different, with the recovery partition OS performing a check of the signature.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      192 months ago

      I’m sure Apple over-engineered the security of this to prevent this from becoming a vector for jailbreaking.

      As a nice side effect, I would trust it.

      Plus the people you would get firmware from like this would be your family/friends/coworkers or maybe an Apple Store employee if you really don’t know anyone else with an iPhone.

    • @Telodzrum
      link
      102 months ago

      I assume it’s signed by Apple, so yes it’s safe. No, you don’t ever want to have to do this.

    • @Ptsf
      link
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      A pre-registered checksum will ensure that the downloaded file is what it says it is before running. So yes, it is safe. Unless you’ve found a collision in the checksum algorithm apple is using, although the chances are better that you’ll squeeze water out of dry desert sand.

      (Edit: To those thinking they’ll rely on just code signing for this, you’re likely way off base.)

  • @ozymandias117
    link
    English
    162 months ago

    All the “portless iPhone” rumors have seemed unlikely because of DFU mode.

    If they can now enter DFU wirelessly from the initial bootloader in silicon, they might actually be close to a portless iPhone

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    I wonder if this development isn’t tied to the sealed box updates tool that rolled out earlier this year.