When Max Himsl opened his electronic ballot on Friday, he was dismayed to see a candidate missing from the list of options.

Voting absentee electronically while living abroad, Himsl saw that under the options for president, only Republican Donald Trump and Independent Robert F. Kennedy Jr. were listed. Missing was Democrat Kamala Harris.

“I’m upset my democratic process was interrupted,” he said.

Election officials were notified of the error shortly after the Electronic Absentee System that allows certain voters to cast their ballot electronically went live on Friday at 8 a.m., according to the Montana Secretary of State’s Office which reported that the error was isolated to the online system.

  • @cybervseas
    link
    English
    1062 months ago

    Not suspicious at all. Mistakes happen. 🤔

  • @NocturnalMorning
    link
    792 months ago

    Somehow I feel like this isn’t going to be the only instance of ‘errors’ as election season gets under way.

  • @halcyoncmdr
    link
    English
    442 months ago

    So, clearly the Montana Secretary of State’s office doesn’t do any testing before making things live.

    • @Jimmyeatsausage
      link
      212 months ago

      Trying to use the Principal of Charity, it was probably just that one or more counties pushed a version of the form out from after the Republican convention, but before the Democratic one.

      I’m fairly confident that if it was done with malice, they’ll figure it out in short order and handle it accordingly. Despite what Republicans want to think, there are a good number of fraud protections built into the system…if there weren’t, it would be easier and more effective for Ryssia/China/Iran/whoever else to directly hack the system than to spend the time and money paying people to shitpost devisive political garbage for months leading up to the election.

  • @AbouBenAdhem
    link
    English
    422 months ago

    It’s a bit suspicious when you can guess what the error was before reading the story.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    312 months ago

    I expected them to diddle with the election, but to do it that obviously and crude?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      And to do it in a state where it literally doesn’t matter? Montana was going to go red regardless, so it’s just stupid to do it there.

    • @pdxfed
      link
      72 months ago

      If you think crude is a barrier, people were goaded to storm our central governing building. Everything is downhill from there in “is it possible?”

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    312 months ago

    Ok. Well first day problems just get it fixed and notify all online absentee voters of the issue.

    • @Treczoks
      link
      152 months ago

      There are genuine “first day errors”, and there are things so completely off, they should not have reached first day at all. I mean, the list of candidates is the key issue here, and nobody even f-ing had looked at it prior to the start?

  • @WoahWoah
    link
    19
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s a feature not a bug. -Montana probably

  • @NotMyOldRedditName
    link
    4
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So are they going to delete all the votes prior to fix and require a revote in case people were duped about their options? Or are they okay with people voting without all the proper information and options?