Negative results are still results!
It pains me that we actually needs to do a study on this.
That’s a pity, we would benefit from more scientists and engineers.
Rather hurtful stereotype.
I don’t see why these 2 would be related, but isn’t it early to be concluding this if these kids are only like 3 years old?
Likely it was a study because there are too many stupid people that believe that vaccines cause autism. Society as a whole has lost the ability to critical think.
Yeah, I guess there’s some value in proving a negative.
But it’s also pretty expensive to test every stupid statement somebody said.
Early therapy is more effective, as well as less potentially traumatizing. To the point that false positives aren’t really a concern.
The most effective therapies just seem like heavilly supervised play-time to your average young kiddo.
“Risk”. Imagine thinking being autistic is a bad thing.
I’m autistic and think it is mostly a bad thing.
You might want to find some (better) support. The progressive view is that autism is neither good nor bad - just different - and most of the “issues” with being autistic stem from a lack of understanding and accommodation from the rest of society.
That doesn’t really help since we do indeed live in a society
Ah yes. Let me just order an understanding community and infrastructure that suited my needs that weren’t met. Let me just revert the lack of development and damage done through neglect. Shall I add some dragons on the side?
None of this adds up to autism being bad.
They should have said “rates”.
