• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    162 months ago

    Whatever strategy they choose is probably going to go wrong as others involved start cutting deals to save themselves.

  • @thesporkeffect
    link
    -62 months ago

    Hakeem Jeffries! What a surprise to see you again on the wrong side of morality and the law!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      His statement is the objectively correct side of morality and the law. Every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty in court. If you disagree with this notion you have no place in any society created after the 1600s.

      • @thesporkeffect
        link
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Okay, I don’t disagree with the statement on the face of it, that’s not what I was reacting to. Why say anything at all, if you are Jeffries? It’s not like it’s going to come out that it was all a big misunderstanding.

        E: alright, I misread the context, fair points

        • @MegaUltraChicken
          link
          62 months ago

          There’s no way the House Minority Leader isn’t going to get questions on this. Seems pretty reasonable to get a public statement out.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Because he’s a New York politician asked for comment about a person he’s previously disagreed with very publicly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -22 months ago

        Plenty of society’s after the 1600s, that had people and rulers who disagreed with that notion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -52 months ago

        Every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

        No. I don’t need to take you to court to prove that you can’t spell ‘escape’ in your username, for example. It’s just an obvious fact.

        You can’t reduce reality to legal issues and then the fact of having committed an unpleasant actions to legal outcomes. Israel could literally blow up courts which start proceedings in terms of international law against the country, for example, that wouldn’t alter the reality of the evidence against Israel.

        If you hit me with your car and I die, and there are witness, you did wrong regardless of what the court says.

        • @idiomaddict
          link
          22 months ago

          Innocent and guilty have formal legal definitions and informal, everyday ones. OJ Simpson was found innocent of murder, but I think it’s probably pretty likely that he did it with intent. Those can both be true.

            • @idiomaddict
              link
              12 months ago

              It’s surprising that you intended to agree with the original commenter whom you replied to, but sometimes it do be like that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 months ago

          Incorrect, the reason we don’t live in the reality you describe is witness testimony is unreliable, and mob justice fails every time it’s tried.

          You are innocent until proven guilty. Period. Otherwise I can just say you killed my uncle and kill you in response to that made up event.