• BrikoX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 hours ago

    This is not new, but it’s well sourced and easily digestible for most people. The issue is that Valve has de facto monopoly and when Epic Games (even selfishly) tried to address that issue gamers went for their throat instead of cheering.

    There are small storefronts that exist in the background, but they are either indie only like itch.io, Game Jolt or run by a publisher with primarily their catalog like GOG, Origin, Uplay (or whatever it’s called now), Battle.net, etc. And even then many of them eventually become available on Steam because that’s what gamers ask for. People are too stupid to help themselves, so unless some regulations force a change, we are stuck with this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Epic Games (even selfishly) tried to address that issue gamers went for their throat instead of cheering.

      Nobody was upset that Epic was offering lower commissions. They’re upset with Epic and their exclusives, and their shitty storefronts that have extremely limited features by comparison.

      Plus we all know the decreased commissions is just their way of attempting to gain market share (as the Chinese are attempting to do in every market), as opposed to just making a better product.

      Steam is far from perfect, but it’s also far and away the best option we have.

      Personally, among other reasons, I dont buy or play any Epic games due to their affiliation with Tencent, and by association, the CCP.

      • BrikoX
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        They’re upset with Epic and their exclusives

        facepalm

        <…> their shitty storefronts that have extremely limited features by comparison.

        Have you used Steam in the early days? It took 5 years before they added basic community features.

        Plus we all know the decreased commissions is just their way of attempting to gain market share, as opposed to just making a better product.

        A better product means nothing if you have no users. Case in point all the enshitified platforms that still exist to this day.

        Steam is far from perfect, but it’s also far and away the best option we have.

        Only option. That’s the ultimate issue, which you prefer to ignore.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 hours ago

          Have you used Steam in the early days?

          …you mean >20 years ago? 🤦 I don’t give a shit what it was like back then, because I buy games in the present.

          A better product means nothing if you have no users

          Make a better product and you’ll have more users. Simple as.

          Only option.

          🤦 That’s just a blatant lie. There are dozens of other options. Who do you think you’re fooling with that lie?

  • @_stranger_
    link
    English
    109 hours ago

    The competition is trash. Other game stores spent their money on enshitification and they’re reaping the rewards of that choice.

    • @zoostation
      link
      English
      19 hours ago

      There should be no middleman, period. You used to be able to buy a game and play it fully offline without a launcher. And you could sell it used when you were finished. Steam normalized digital “ownership” taking away those rights.

      • @_stranger_
        link
        English
        39 hours ago

        Ultimately I agree with you. Steam offered it, and people took it. I don’t have a CD-rom drive anymore, and I doubt you do either. I don’t like that aspect of it either.

    • 101OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -19 hours ago

      How did itch and Game Jolt do that?