• @qooqie
    link
    19
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This movies takeaway wasn’t good or bad about physics. It was more that nature is a neutral force and humans will always use it to enact awful displays of “justice”. The movie was as much a warning about nuclear weapons as it was a warning that humans will do anything to further their own goals.

  • @gosling
    link
    131 year ago

    The Social Network out of all movies/shows? I don’t know, Queen’s Gambit to chess players would’ve been a better example

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      No doubt there are better examples. But him choosing the Social Network just shows the kinda guy he is. Plus the point of Oppenheimer went right over his head

    • @gosling
      link
      171 year ago

      It is, it’s about the creation of Facebook hence the title. The movie itself is very well made and I highly recommend it, but using it as an example… yikes.

      I mean watching a bunch of dudes making something did inspire me to make something, but I can think of tons of other shows that does the same without the main character screwing over a lot of people to get where he wants.

  • mohKohn
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    for context, Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, and founder cofounder of YCombinator one of the original startup accelerators.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I remember hearing similar sentiments from a couple of decades ago about nuclear physics and engineering in particular. Because they’re not seen as cutting edge fields anymore, they have a hard time competing against other sciences and engineering disciplines. When you factor in computer science as well, things look even more grim.

    It’s not new, though. The excellent textbook Feynman on Physics was part of an effort by CalTech to make physics more attractive to the smartest students. Their approach was to get Richard Feynman to teach Physics 101 for a year.

    I’m not sure CalTech ever had a legitimate problem with attracting brilliant students to study physics, to be honest, and I suspect that if there was a desperate need for nuclear science the government would be pretty free with scholarships and research grants.

    I haven’t watched the movie yet, but I am very familiar with the story. I can’t imagine a biography of Oppenheimer in particular would make someone want to go into physics. Maybe a biography of Feynman would, though. Marie Curie. All I can remember about Neil’s Bohr at the moment is that his department made him go into theoretical physics because he was ridiculously clumsy and kept breaking lab equipment. I’m sure there’s others.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Wasn’t “The Social Network” literally about “brodudes” and simplified it down to “They did it to get chicks bro!”

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    -191 year ago

    Oh yeah, let’s use the Nazi opportunist Oppenheimer as an inspiration so we can sweep the fact that the USA recruited him from the rubbles of the German Reich because they were so impressed with his cruise missiles.

    • @pleasantboat
      link
      English
      221 year ago

      You’re actually thinking of Wernher von Braun there.

      • Zorque
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        He was born in New York to German Jewish immigrants.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          91 year ago

          And like many members of the Manhattan project he was driven out of fear that the Nazis would build the bomb first

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      we did recruit Nazi scientists, that’s true, but last I checked, we did that after WWII was over and the Nazi empire was, in fact, rubble.

      I should not need to explain why the events of Oppenheimer take place before that point.