• @ReginaPhalange
      link
      English
      915 hours ago

      I’m guessing that the intention is "If Israel can handle missiles from Lebanon and Gaza, why can’t they handle 10 times the normal amount from Iran.
      It’s a numbers game , and w/o the US and Jordan helping to intercept them , the civilian damage would be much much much more extensive; and only one of these 2 can be true - Iran has terrible terrible terrible aim, or they targeted civilians.

      • You’re right about saturation attacks eventually overcoming every air defense. But the ~200 missiles from Iran would have been manageable for Iron Dome, if they were the kind of missile Iron Dome was built for – slow, short range rockets and mortars.

        These were much faster, at least some of them maneuvered during flight and a lot of them had a terminal booster, so they were much faster.

        Israel has systems for that, namely Arrow 2/3 (the latter even intercepts exoatmospheric and it looks fucking dope) and David’s Sling. But they are definitely not made for the sort of massed attack we saw. They’re more like a Patriot system.

      • @fox2263
        link
        English
        18 hours ago

        Iron dome not intended for ballistic defense, which is what the Iranians chucked at them

  • @Ellvix
    link
    English
    271 day ago

    And the Avatar

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 day ago

      Keys, Wallet, Phone, Military Technology.

      These four elements lived together in peace until the religious extremists attacked the other religious extremists because they can’t agree on who’s rock was touched by a historical celebrity more, which historical celebrity is more popular, or how to calculate the proper cost of revenge after 1000 years of multi-generational-fued inflation, or something pointless like that.

      Now our only hope is the Tax dollars - the master of all consumer and military products - to unite the world once again.