• @mycodesucks
    link
    English
    5921 hours ago

    I hate Google as much as anybody else, but that Google has been ordered to open up when they already allow side loading, and Apple is apparently all good, is all you need to know this whole system is a joke.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 hours ago

      Apple isn’t on third party hardware.

      They aren’t controlling access to software on other manufacturers devices like Google is.

      • @mycodesucks
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That’s not actually true though.

        Android is open source and many devices, mostly Chinese products, launch with custom Android builds completely free of Google services. This is not a Google constraint - manufacturers CHOOSE to use Android builds that use Google’s services. Creating your own build simply stops you from integrating Google’s services into the OS, which is actually a PLUS if you ask me.

        Even if they WERE requiring it, that would have nothing to do with end user store front installation, which is already something you can do, as shown by the 2 non-Google app stores I have installed on my phone.

        Again… I’m not defending Google as some kind of good company here. I’m simply stating there is no way to make an anti-competitivity argument against Google in mobile that doesn’t apply at least as much to Apple. This is a nonsensical double-standard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2220 hours ago

      Google is big enough to be considered a monopoly in mobile phone operating systems. Play Store is technically a separate service / business which enjoys unfair advantage of being installed by default. I think this approach might be good because it’s better for user experience (unlike EU web browser thing for example) and has a good shot at postiviely affecting power balance between app developers and platform owner.

      I’m curious how this will play out. Apple should be next obviously.

      • @mycodesucks
        link
        English
        2520 hours ago

        Apple was first. And the courts ruled it no problem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          320 hours ago

          I meant “next big corpo beaten into submission by regulators”. I don’t think Epic gave up on them yet.

          • @mycodesucks
            link
            English
            718 hours ago

            I wouldn’t say Google has been “beaten into submission”. They still interweave their crap services into every Android phone with no ability to remove or disable them, couple their apps with an intrusive, privacy violating, system degrading backend with special rules for its own apps versus everybody else… even force the default system web browser to be an unremovable Chrome installation, and not even a peep from regulators that any of this might be anti-competitive.

            No company has been properly beaten into submission since Ma Bell. Even the big Microsoft browser decision in the 90s turned out to be a joke - they’re right back to doing the same thing with impunity.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Even if things go well it will be one thing at a time probably. This news doesn’t sound big because Google is so big but for businesses dependent on Google infrastructure this is a major win, no?

              My perspective might be skewed since I live in EU and we mostly won right to our data and privacy.

              • @mycodesucks
                link
                English
                217 hours ago

                I appreciate you guys fighting the good fight.

                At least SOMEONE’S on it.

  • Rixonomic
    link
    English
    221 hours ago

    Does this mean Aurorastore will be useful again?

      • Rixonomic
        link
        English
        414 hours ago

        A couple years ago, I used Aurora to install paid games on my Shield TV. Games that Google Play doesn’t normally allow on the Shield (like the PS2 era GTA games). Well Google changed something, and it’s no longer possible to download and install purchased apps or games through Aurora, even if you log into your Google account. This sucks, because I formatted my Shield TV expecting be able to reinstall these games, but it doesn’t work anymore.

        Yeah, Aurora is still good, but Google has been crippling it.

        • Brad Boimler
          link
          fedilink
          English
          313 hours ago

          Is it the pro or the tube shield the tube is 32 bit only and most apps and games have moved to 64 bit only so the pro would be needed but I can still install paid apps on aurora on my phone just fine.

          • Rixonomic
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Aurora stores GitHub page states under the Limitation section that it is not able to install, or update paid apps.

            Provides only base minimum features Can not download or update paid apps.

            https://github.com/whyorean/AuroraStore

            • Brad Boimler
              link
              fedilink
              English
              112 hours ago

              Odd I used it to install GTA: SA definitive edition purchased on the play store website then installed and updated via Aurora still works just updated it recently too.

              • Rixonomic
                link
                English
                110 hours ago

                It might be the kind of thing that works sometimes in some situations, but isn’t officially supported.

                Either way, it used to work for my ShieldTV Pro, but it doesn’t work anymore. Doesn’t matter how many devices I try to spoof, or how many times I reinstall the app, or how many times I re-login, etc.

                Makes me really sad that I formatted the Shield TV. Oh well.