• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1720 hours ago

    What I don’t get about sovcits is that they are trying to operate under a different legal system that leads where exactly? Do they think that eventually they’ll reach an Arcane Judge who will acknowledge that they’ve cracked the code and can go on about their business, unlike the rest of us suckers who don’t know the right incantations?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Literally yes.

      They think they can exploit the legal system in such a way that they get all the legal protecions, but none of the responsibility or liability.

      They want to legally drive on roads they don’t pay for while obeying none of the laws, all without insurance or any legal liability to other drivers.

      They want us to be their suckers.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3324 hours ago

    Give these guys another ten years and no one will understand anything they say because they will have invented their own language that only they understand.

    • @meco03211
      link
      3523 hours ago

      They already do this. There’s videos of these idiots threatening to “sue your bond” whatever the hell that means. They also take normal words and reinterpret them to mean something completely different than intended. There was an idiot in court being asked if he wanted to be represented by the public defender. He acted confused and asserted he was fully capable of presenting himself to the court, and there would be no need to RE-present himself again. They be crazy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1222 hours ago

      Is that not already the case?

      I think maybe /u/[email protected] would be the best person round these parts to write a sovcit to sane person dictionary, as much as it’s even possible (because I’m fairly sure a lot of things can’t even be translated).

      Like what the hell is “Without prejudice” supposed to mean here? I know what either of the words alone mean, but I have no idea what THEY mean by prejudice. Other than that, this one seems to be one of the more understandable posts as far as use of language is concerned.

      • IninewCrow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 minutes ago

        This would be a great plot point to some novel or movie that someone could write.

        Some post apocalyptic society of people who are trying to survive in a new world run into a community of people that speak this strange foreign language. The lost survivors can understand individual words but the meanings or associations to all those words have been lost and now mean new things that can no longer be understood.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2023 hours ago

    So much effort.

    Just produce a laminated, card sized piece of paper that says “without prejudice” in red ink and call it your licence/ID/whatever.

    • @wiccan2
      link
      1623 hours ago

      Did you even do your research before writing this, you can’t just write “without prejudice” in red ink, it has to be diagonal to make it legitimate.

      /S

  • metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    1223 hours ago

    Do you know how you get a licence while retaining all your rights? you just get a fucking licence. Stop making problems for your person.

    These brain doners are why actual sovereign individuals don’t talk publicly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      722 hours ago

      brain doners

      I do wonder if you originally meant “brain donors” or “brain döners”. I think the latter makes more sense in this instance.

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        722 hours ago

        Oh right, I always forget about the lawful right to endanger the public with an uninsured non-roadworthy private conveyance. My mistake.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      1124 hours ago

      Illinois is also Sec of State, but we all call it DMV.