“child, 13” - a 13yo is a teenager, not a child.
That article was a pain in the ass to read, horribly structured.
What she did: “The court heard the girl was taken to the protest outside the Potters International Hotel, which houses asylum seekers, by a parent of a friend. Police body-worn video showed the teenager briefly bang and kick at a door of the hotel while voices could be heard telling her to stop.”
Her sentence, a “12-month referral order”: “A referral order means you are required to attend a youth offender panel. The panel, you, your parents/carers and the victim (where appropriate) agree a contract aimed at repairing the harm that has been caused and addressing the causes of the offending behaviours.” (https://unlock.org.uk/advice/referral-order-18/)
The conviction seems to be on permanent record, though, which does seem a bit much for this considering her age.
Teenagers are children, my dude.
Teenagers are minors, but not children, my guy.
If the Wikipedia page on expungement is accurate there is some sort of process where it will get sealed from public view after a certain amount of time has passed.
I do agree if this is a one off thing it shouldn’t haunt the rest of her life, especially given the fact that we’re talking about a thirteen year old who was a victim of (at best) extremely negligent caregiving.
Conservatives when a criminal justice system is punishing someone they don’t like: “Blood for the blood god!”
Conservatives when someone’s held accountable for a hate crime: “What has happened to our humanity?!”
Daily Express - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Daily Express:
MBFC: Right - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1958933/uk-riots-child-sentenced-no-future?int_source=nba