• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    203 months ago

    Cmon murica, the rest of the world combined is now spending more than just the US. How could this happen?

    • @ooliOP
      link
      133 months ago

      what is sad, is that for 10 perfect year between 1990 and 2000 we could believe that humanity was on its way to world peace…now we’re back to total annihilation program

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        A specific event in 2001 first triggered the growth, then a couple of jackass presidents made it worse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Exactly the years that OG Millennials went from small children to adults, and then off to college to saddle ourselves with debt for a future that would never exist. Yay

      • @sorval_the_eeter
        link
        23 months ago

        Netenyahu, Putin, Biden and Modi should be in chains in the darkest deepest prison cell humanity can create.

        • Match!!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          biden isn’t really on that list. essentially it should be a rotating slot for whoever is elected US president

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    After the end of the Cold War, there’s a clear trend in US spending where it ratchets down every year during Democratic administrations and up again during Republican administrations. The only exceptions are the first two years of the Obama admin, after he inherited Bush’s wars, and 2023, after Russia invaded Ukraine

    • @JackLSauce
      link
      6
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I agree in spirit but a CPI applied to military expenditure would be adjusting for prices of irrelevant items and could become very skewed at such large scales

      Admittedly I don’t know have a better idea either so… Guess I’m hoping somebody smarter than me can chime in

    • @Godric
      link
      23 months ago

      Yeah, what this graph mostly tells you is that things cost more in the US.

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    that dip between 1990 and 2000 is the specific reason the 90s were good

  • @themachine
    link
    53 months ago

    I don’t understand how to read this graph.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      Each column represents the total military spend of the world’s countries in that year. Each column is further broken into what separate parts spent that year, the categories for those parts being America, Russia/USSR, China, NATO except America, and the rest of the world.

      So to pick some examples out, we can see Soviet expenditure (the bright red section of each column) crash enormously when the country fell apart in 1991. Post-Soviet Russia hardly spent anything by comparison, so the red section of each column got really small all of a sudden. This combined with the reduction in American expenditure (the pale blue section) in the 90s resulted in a low total spend for the world (the total height of each stack), even though the spending of every other country outside of those two stayed fairly constant (the pink for China, dark blue for non-USA NATO, and grey for everyone else).

  • @captainlezbian
    link
    33 months ago

    Ok I’m actually shocked that the sino-Soviet split and Chinese development of thermonuclear weapons doesn’t show up on china’s portion of this graph

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23 months ago

    So… tensions now are higher than they’ve ever been, even at the height of the cold war? Is that a fair assessment on the situation?