• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    Not something anyone should be killed or threatened for, but it’s still being an asshole on purpose.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 year ago

      Sure, but surely there’s a point where the government will prosecute hate crimes, or potentially refuse to protect you from the consequences.

  • Spzi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    What’s not okay: To expect others to submit to rules of your worldview. Especially if others do not share this view or agree to the rule.

    You have the right to believe whatever you like, but don’t expect me to follow. Because I have the same right.

    This applies to acts which do not harm anybody or anything, like destroying a copy of a book which you own, without eradicating the book from existence or taking it from others.

    Otherwise, we play the victim game. I can do that too! Look, I’m an atheist. This is a very serious thing for me. I feel appalled by the idea that more than 200 years after the enlightenment (just to name one of many reasons), people still believe and share religious ideas. The abrahamic scriptures are riddled with hate speech and endorsements of violence. To call these text collections ‘holy’ is an insult to everything I hold dear, like science and human rights. I’m offended by their mere existence, and perceive public displays as a personal offense to my worldview. I demand everybody in every country to respect my feelings and stop these atrocious acts.

    Of course the sane alternative would be to thicken my skin, learn to deal with my emotions (which means I deal with them, not externalizing), respect differences as long as they do no harm.

    These book burnings only exist because people make an unjustified fuzz about it, occasionally in a violent way. You can have your religion with all it’s rules, but you cannot expect people to apply who don’t subscribe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Yeah book burnings are totally an affirmation of free and open discussion and in no way reflects a deeply seated intolerance. Countries with regular book burnings are bastions of freedom.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I think the difference is if it’s the State burning the books because they are “dangerous” and the State doesn’t want you to read it then that speaks of fascism. If it is citizens/civilians burning a book, that they own, because of some personal desire to express themselves then it’s their expression.

        Maybe they are expressiomlns of hate, but a citizen expressing that is different than the State expressing that. One has more power over the other.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Nazi book burnings were conducted by the German Student Union primarily, not the state. Just as it is in Florida, and just as it is here in this instance, book burnings are primarily perpetrated by ideologues, not the state.

  • Bloops
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Really ridiculous. Can’t they touch silicon and stick to 4chan?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    That’s like, the stupidest witch hunt.

    They could be protesting for actual issues like climate change, but they are over there burning books. And nobody knows what they are trying to do.

  • auth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -81 year ago

    If they would have done that in a Muslim country they would be dead… They are crazy

    • @M0ty
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Is that a good thing?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      This is why it needs to be done - each day until the violence stops. Its disrespectful sure, but to see all the Arabic nations raise up over a burned book just shows it’s all about local control. Nobody cares about their brothers being slaughtered in Israel, but burn a book and they’re all in the streets. Making noise that nobody ever hears. I’m places few visit. It’s a circus and their rulers are surfing on that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -151 year ago

    You never see edgelord atheists burning Bibles to trigger Christians - and the reason they don’t is because they know they won’t get away with it. But since Muslims have been designated as an “acceptable” target in the west, this shit is allowed - and the right-wingers know they can push people into accepting their agenda like this.

    • hh93
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Everyone can burn a bible if they want

        • takeda
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Just a week or two ago there was an article where another protester was planned to burn Bible in front of Israeli embassy to show a point.

          There was a response from a Rabbi saying that he doesn’t approve it, that he also similarly doesn’t approve burning Koran, it serves no other purpose that to generate hate, but freedom of expression is also sacred and he won’t go against it.

    • Fantasy
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      the reason they don’t is because they know they won’t get away with it

      What do you mean by “won’t get away with it”? Also the article doesn’t mention anything about atheism, only ‘anti-Muslim’, which are obviously two very different things. I’m fairly certain the reason why you see less Bible burnings than Quran burnings in the west is because the west is predominantly Christian, so of course there would be less burning of the Bible, not because of the notion of some atheists of ‘getting away with it’.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        so of course there would be less burning of the Bible,

        There is absolutely no particular reason you should see Quran burnings in the west, either… that is, unless it’s the same old west demonizing the same old “other.”

        not because of the notion of some atheists of ‘getting away with it’.

        No, it’s a valid question - if this is (supposedly) about “freedom of speech” (which the Quran burners always pretend it’s all about), why don’t you see these vitriolic right-wing atheists (for which dipshits like Bill Maher is a spokesperson) test “freedom of speech” by burning Bibles? I mean… this is about “freedom of speech,” isn’t it?

    • Spzi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      You never see edgelord atheists burning Bibles to trigger Christians - and the reason they don’t is because they know they won’t get away with it.

      Rather because we know we get away with it. Because most Christians don’t feel so entitled to expect others to live by their rules, and threaten them with death when they don’t.

      These provocations make sense as long as the other side takes offense for so little, in such a violent way. It’s this encroaching and inacceptable attitude which makes resistance a necessity.

      The article sheds no light on what the actual motives of these particular protesters are.

      • OrangeSlice
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Because most Christians don’t feel so entitled to expect others to live by their rules, and threaten them with death when they don’t.

        Ok come on, my friend. I know a bible burning won’t get you the death penalty, but many many many people have been killed and imprisoned for not living to Christian values, especially in the United States. It’s “just a few crazies” or whatever, but it really isn’t since these actions happen in an environment of indirect public support.

        • Spzi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          many many many people have been killed and imprisoned for not living to Christian values, especially in the United States.

          As an outsider, I may not be aware of what you mean.

          If you’re hinting at colonization: Yes, definitely. But that is no longer practiced, or is it?

          If you had recent or current events in mind: I’m not aware of those, please explain.

          • OrangeSlice
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I see, I’m gonna make a low-ish effort post, but I’m happy to discuss further if you’d like:

            • Colonization still happens, but I think it matters that it happened in the past too. I would say that one of the most prominent recent examples would be the American invasion of Iraq. There are many political and economic aspects to the invasion, but one cultural angle is that it was widely supported by religious conservatives due to their opposition to Islam. American leadership was ghoulish in their own way, and to incompetent to actually colonize the country, but many of the literal footsoldiers joined the military to “get back at them for what they did to us”, although as we know, none of the 9-11 terrorists were Iraqi.
            • Another example that springs to mind is the ongoing homophobic and transphobic hate crimes. One specific example would be the Pulse nightclub mass shooting. I would suggest that most American Christians don’t support death for being gay, just the same as most American/Western Muslims don’t support death for burning the Quran, but in other countries where religion overlaps more with politics, both of these can be considered serious criminial offenses.

            I only mean to suggest that both religions have a bit of bloodthirst in them, which doesn’t apply to everyone, but is certainly comparable. We can go deeper into the details, I just felt like you were giving Christians a bit of a pass that they don’t deserve.

            • Spzi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              That helps to understand where you are coming from, thanks for the explanation. While I see differences, I also see the similarities.

              I only mean to suggest that both religions have a bit of bloodthirst in them, which doesn’t apply to everyone, but is certainly comparable. We can go deeper into the details, I just felt like you were giving Christians a bit of a pass that they don’t deserve.

              Oh, definitely. Sorry if I gave the impression to have any good opinion about Christianity. I despise it wholeheartedly.

              I only, and specifically, meant that the trouble you get for burning scripture is very different in Islam and Christianity. The latter probably has more blood on it’s hands overall, but that’s a different topic from my point of view. Also the overwhelming majority of both religions are decent, peaceful people.

              They can believe what they want and live by their rules if they want. Just as others can disbelieve what they want and disrespect religious rules if they want. These rules have no power outside of their own bubble. It should be opt-in. At least it should be opt-out. But they must be optional.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        and threaten them with death when they don’t.

        You mean… except for that entire colonialism thing, huh?

        These provocations make sense as long as the other side takes offense for so little

        Go burn Bibles in public, then… we’ll see how long it takes the christo-fascists to show up at your door. Somehow, I don’t think you will.

        The article sheds no light on what the actual motives of these particular protesters are.

        Don’t have to… it’s very easy to tell what they are. And it seems plenty of people are willing to run interference for these nazis - as long as they can be aimed at Muslims, of course.

        • Spzi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          that entire colonialism thing

          Not entirely sure what you meant with this short remark. I oppose colonialism for the same reason I oppose people who impose their belief on others. Because I support each and everyone’s human rights.

          Go burn Bibles in public, then… we’ll see how long it takes the christo-fascists to show up at your door. Somehow, I don’t think you will.

          Can you point me to any incident in the past where burnt bibles lead to angry mobs, setting buildings on fire or killing people? I’m not aware this exists. If that was a thing, I would fully support burning bibles, although I’m personally not.

          willing to run interference for these nazis - as long as they can be aimed at Muslims

          I understand your concern but I’m not in that camp, on the contrary. There are more sides to this story. There is a significant overlap between the reasons for me being antifascist and the reasons for opposing imposing beliefs.

          You could be right in this case, we don’t know.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I can take a dump on the bible and burn it in front of the vatican and there is a good chance that nothing bad will happen to me.