• Nate Cox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 months ago

    No.

    Bring back my hopeful vision of the future Star Trek, I’m all done with this new wave.

    • @Nuke_the_whales
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So don’t watch it. And you think strange new worlds is bad??

    • Corgana
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Did you even watch the movie? I swear half the people on here are bots.

      • Nate Cox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Did I even watch the movie which hasn’t come out yet? I’m pretty sure I know which of us is a bot.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    I was kind of hoping that after 2023, she would decide to not do this. I think Michelle Yeoh is fantastic, generational actress; but I’m highly skeptical of recent Star Trek works. She is by far the biggest name to return to the franchise.

    Hopefully, they have an excellent story to match.

    • @Nuke_the_whales
      link
      English
      13 months ago

      You wanted her to not take a job cause some star trek fans didn’t want this?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        No, I didn’t want a dark Section 31 series based on the Discovery/Picard “Dark Trek” writing style.

        Michelle Yeoh winning the Oscar was an easy cop out. Now she’s in another league in terms of salary, and Paramount can’t afford to pay her for a streaming series. Both sides go their separate ways and the idea is dropped.

        Fortunately for us, she loves the character and wanted to do at least one final act. So I guess the compromise is the movie instead of the series.

        And that is cause for optimism because it likely means the script was good enough to draw her back, and concise enough that the Section 31 thing won’t be dragged out.

        Hey, we’re finally getting a new Trek movie, and it has a big name actress behind it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    Does this mean it’s not showing in theaters on release, only on Paramount+? That’s a strange decision. I assume they’re hoping new people will sign up for Paramount+ to see it, but showing it in theaters could get a lot of new people interested in star trek who then might be motivated to sign up and check out the shows.

    Also I was looking forward to seeing it on the big screen. Oh well.

    • @mrcleanup
      link
      English
      73 months ago

      I just watched a fascinating documentary on Star Trek and they talked about how paramount kept trying to launch their own network on the back of Star Trek as it’s cash cow and how they kept failing because it was all they had on it and not enough viewers.

      Problem solved by making all the different kinds of shows into Star Trek, I guess, but how are they going to grow a fan base if it’s all locked behind a paywall that only people who already love it will pay to get through?

      • @bitchkat
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        You’re talking about the old UPN network?

        • @mrcleanup
          link
          English
          23 months ago

          And now Paramount+. Even now their strategy seems to be to fill it with Star Trek and wait for the cash to roll in.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    Nice, been waiting for this as I abandoned Discovery once her story was over. I view it as a TV movie or basically a long double episode.